Tension in Two Strings With Different Angles

AI Thread Summary
To analyze the tension in two strings at different angles supporting a 200g mass, it's crucial to understand that the system is in equilibrium. Knowing the tension in one string and its angle allows for the calculation of the unknown tension in the other string. The equilibrium condition requires resolving the tensions into vertical and horizontal components, which can be achieved using trigonometric functions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using two equations to solve for the two unknowns, specifically the magnitudes of the tensions. Ultimately, the problem was resolved with the assistance of other participants.
Cjjw
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have been stuck on this question for a while, and I need help figuring it out.
For a lab, we had two ring stands set up about 1m apart from each other, with the rings at different heights, and we tied a string between them. We then placed a 200g mass on the string. We had a LabPro with a force sensor attatched to one of the strings to read the tension, but we don't have the tension for the other string. We're supposed to resolve each tension into vertical and horizontal components, but I'm not sure how to do that when we don't have the tension in the one string.
Can anyone help me out with that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know that the mass is in equilibrium. Knowing one tension and its direction, and the direction of the other tension, you should be able to determine the magnitude of the unknown tension which keeps the 200g mass in equilibrium.
 
By the direction, do you mean the angle? And if so, how would I use the directions to determine the magnitude?
 
And would I be doing the two equations and two unknowns thing?
 
Ok, I figured it out. Thanks for your help!
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top