Register to reply

100MW reactor must produce a 110MW

by EinsteinII
Tags: 100mw, 110mw, produce, reactor
Share this thread:
Dec3-12, 10:06 PM
Astronuc's Avatar
P: 21,827
Quote Quote by russ_watters View Post
Can you also increase the output of the reactor by lowering the water temperature? Ie, by drawing energy off faster with those heat exchangers? Heat exchangers are designed for adverse conditions (warmer cooling water) and if the cooling water is unusually cold, you can pull more heat from a heat exhchanger than it is designed for. Similarly, I would think you can over-rev a turbine (not certain) by putting more electrical load on the generator -- for example by increasing the RPM or prop pitch of the propulsion system.
These are good questions.

Let me just point out that a naval nuclear power plant (primarily for propulsion) operates a bit differently than a commercial power plant (for electrical generation and contrained to a 60 Hz grid in the US or 50 Hz in Europe and other countries).

To get more efficiency out of a nuclear power plant one either raises the hot temperature to the high pressure turbine, or reduces the cold temperature in the condenser, after discharge from the LP turbine. When the cooling water is warmer, the turbines are slightly less efficient.

Generally reactors are contrained by cladding surface temperatures on the fuel. The higher the temperature the higher the corrosion (cladding oxidation). There is also a concern about nucleate boiling in PWRs, since that is where crud likes to deposit, and that can (and has in rare cases) lead to fuel failure (water chemistry, e.g., pH and Ni content is usually the other factor). The hot coolant temperature is usually limited because corrosion of steam generator materials (which is usually the main source of crud species). Lower cooling water temperature at the condenser is a preferred way to get more efficiency, but it's usually a fraction of a percent.

Commercial plants must produce electricity at 60 Hz or 50 Hz, to large turbines run at 1800 rpm (60 Hz) or 1500/3000 rpm (50 Hz), and there is little variation.

Reducing core inlet temperature, but reducing feedwater temperature can increase reactivity in the core, and this can be used toward end of cycle to get a little more energy out of the core - but that doesn't so much increase the thermal efficiecy of the plant.

Some plants have replaced their turbines with more efficient turbines, with advanced blade geometry and improved sealing between stages. This can boost efficient 1 to 2%, as has been the case at some German plants. The best PWRs are about 36 to 37% efficient, from a combination of slightly higher hot temperature in conjunction with more efficient turbines.

As far as I know, naval plants aren't as constrained as commercial plants.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Light-water reactor and plutonium produce ! Nuclear Engineering 2
Project in relation to Einstein on geo-reactors Astronomy & Astrophysics 1
A possible way to produce thrust from ZPE? General Physics 6