How to derive the formula for Gravitational Potential Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The formula for gravitational potential energy, -GMm/r, is derived using integral calculus to calculate the work needed to move an object from an infinite distance to a point r. The gravitational force is expressed as F_grav = -GMm/r², and the potential energy is found by integrating this force from infinity to r. Newton's law of gravitation is empirical and cannot be derived from other fundamental laws. The derivation highlights the relationship between gravitational force and potential energy. Understanding this derivation is essential for grasping the principles of gravitational interactions.
Tommy1995
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
How did scientists derive the formula -GMm/r=Ep in order to calculate the amount of work required to move an object from an infinitely large point (or an extremely large distance as my textbook says) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did scientists derive the formula -GMm/r=Ep in order to calculate the amount of work required to move an object from an infinitely large point (or an extremely large distance as my textbook says) ?

Experimental observation and number fudging to find the constant of proportionality G.
 
Tommy1995 said:
How did scientists derive the formula -GMm/r=Ep

not "G"...
 
Tommy1995 said:
How did scientists derive the formula -GMm/r=Ep

They used integral calculus.

$$PE_{grav} = - \int^r_\infty {F_{grav} dr^\prime}
= - \int^r_\infty {\left( -\frac{GmM}{{r^\prime}^2} \right) dr^\prime}
= - \frac{GmM}{r}$$
 
Newton's law of graviation is emperical - it can't be derived from some other fundamental law or set of equations. This is the case with all the basic laws of physics - nature is the way it is.

If you want to read more about the history try here and related pages:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_law_of_universal_gravitation
 
Thanks ya'll!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top