What about physics before electroweak symmetry breaking?

In summary, the standard model without symmetry breaking can potentially describe the universe after the big bang, before the moment of electroweak symmetry breaking. At this time, all particles would have been massless and electric charge would not be a useful quantum number. However, new physics is needed to explain the overabundance of matter over antimatter. The electric charge as defined would still be conserved, but would not provide any additional information.
  • #1
naima
Gold Member
938
54
Hi Pf

I would like to know if the standard model without symmetry breaking can describe
the universe after the big bang before the moment when EW symmetry breaking occured.
Had we v = c for all particles?
were electrons electrically charged? were there photons or B ? Z0 were not born?
Could anyone tell me what we know about this period?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If there is no physics beyond the standard model (SM) up to very high energies, then yes the SM with an unbroken gauge symmetry should describe the particles and their interactions at temperatures higher than the phase transition temperature.

All SM particles would be massless except the higgs itself ( protons and neutrons woudn't exist, only massless quarks and gluons). massless of course implies v=c. At least one Additional particle which accounts for the dark matter is thought to exist, which may very well be massive even when the SM symmetry is unbroken.

Electric charge woudn't be a useful quantum number, rather hypercharge and weak isospin would be.

photons and Z bosons woudn't be useful degrees of freedom, rather [itex]B[/itex] and [itex]W^{1,2,3}[/itex] would be.

We know however, that some new physics must be relevant in order to produce the overabundance of matter over antimatter, which can't be explained in the framework of the SM. The asymmetry however might have been produced at temperatures much higher than the EW phase transition.
 
  • #3
thank you
if T3 and Yw are good number why not Q (the sum T3 + Yw/2)?
 
  • #4
The electric charge as defined will still be conserved, but its conservation won't give any further information on top of the conservation of [itex]T_{3}[/itex] and [itex]y[/itex] and thus would not be of any particular use.
 

Related to What about physics before electroweak symmetry breaking?

1. What is electroweak symmetry breaking?

Electroweak symmetry breaking is a fundamental process in particle physics where the weak force and the electromagnetic force, which were previously thought to be separate, are unified into a single electroweak force.

2. Why is electroweak symmetry breaking important?

Electroweak symmetry breaking is important because it helps explain why some particles have mass while others do not. It also provides a theoretical framework for understanding the behavior of particles at high energies.

3. What was physics like before electroweak symmetry breaking?

Before electroweak symmetry breaking, physicists believed that the weak force and the electromagnetic force were separate and distinct. The Standard Model of particle physics was also incomplete without the incorporation of electroweak symmetry breaking.

4. How was electroweak symmetry breaking discovered?

Electroweak symmetry breaking was discovered in the 1960s and 1970s through a series of experiments at particle accelerators. The discovery was a major breakthrough in particle physics and led to the Nobel Prize in Physics being awarded to the scientists involved.

5. What are the implications of electroweak symmetry breaking?

The discovery of electroweak symmetry breaking has had a significant impact on our understanding of the fundamental forces and particles in the universe. It has also helped guide further research and experiments in particle physics, leading to a deeper understanding of the universe and its origins.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
805
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top