Register to reply

Equation of motion with proportional drag

by Hannibal123
Tags: drag, equation, motion, proportional
Share this thread:
Hannibal123
#1
Dec19-12, 02:47 PM
P: 19
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

the forces will be like this

[tex]m⋅dv/dt=-m⋅g-k⋅v[/tex]

I need to find the velocity equation and the place equation, thereby meaning the integral of the velocity equation. for the condition t,v=0,v_0



3. The attempt at a solution
i have found this
[tex]v(t)=mg/k*(-1+e^(-k/m⋅t))+v_0⋅e^(-k/m⋅t)[/tex] or in picture form http://imgur.com/WjksG

But I am not sure it's correct
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
NASA team lays plans to observe new worlds
IHEP in China has ambitions for Higgs factory
Spinach could lead to alternative energy more powerful than Popeye
ehild
#2
Dec19-12, 03:39 PM
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 10,349
Quote Quote by Hannibal123 View Post
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

the forces will be like this

[tex]m⋅dv/dt=-m⋅g-k⋅v[/tex]

I need to find the velocity equation and the place equation, thereby meaning the integral of the velocity equation. for the condition t,v=0,v_0



3. The attempt at a solution
i have found this
[tex]v(t)=\frac{mg}{k}(-1+e^{-\frac{k}{m}t})+v_0⋅e^{-\frac{k}{m}t}[/tex] or in picture form http://imgur.com/WjksG

But I am not sure it's correct
It looks correct, but v0=0 .

Edit: I misread vo, so it is correct.

ehild
haruspex
#3
Dec19-12, 03:43 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
P: 9,644
Your answer looks right to me. Why do you doubt it?

haruspex
#4
Dec19-12, 03:44 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
P: 9,644
Equation of motion with proportional drag

Quote Quote by ehild View Post
It looks correct, but v0=0 .

ehild
I read the OP condition as initially (t,v) = (0, v0)
ehild
#5
Dec19-12, 03:53 PM
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 10,349
Quote Quote by haruspex View Post
I read the OP condition as initially (t,v) = (0, v0)
Sorry, I misread it. Edit my post.

ehild
Hannibal123
#6
Dec19-12, 04:40 PM
P: 19
Quote Quote by haruspex View Post
I read the OP condition as initially (t,v) = (0, v0)
that is what i meant. I doubt the results because when i draw them in a graph they dosen't seem to be correct. I have drawn them i geogebra if you are familiar with that software.
My values are:
m: 0,145 kg
k: 0,0032
g: (gravity acceleration) 9,82
v_0: 9,93 m/s

this is what i have entered in geogebra: g(x) =(0.145*9.82/0.0032)*(-1 + ℯ^(0x / 0.15)) + 9.93ℯ^(0x / 0.15)
if you want to try for yourself (should save you some time). These values are not meant for a proportional drag, but still it seems weird that the graph looks like one of a constant function
http://imgur.com/FFElN (the red one)
Hannibal123
#7
Dec19-12, 04:42 PM
P: 19
Furthermore when i integrate the velocity equation i get this http://imgur.com/IO6G6
Again not sure if I am correct
haruspex
#8
Dec19-12, 07:44 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
P: 9,644
Quote Quote by Hannibal123 View Post
m: 0,145 kg
k: 0,0032
g: (gravity acceleration) 9,82
v_0: 9,93 m/s

this is what i have entered in geogebra: g(x) =(0.145*9.82/0.0032)*(-1 + ℯ^(0x / 0.15)) + 9.93ℯ^(0x / 0.15)
How did -k/m end up as 0 / 0.15? Looks like rounding error, and the red line graph seems to be a consequence.
Hannibal123
#9
Dec19-12, 07:59 PM
P: 19
Turns out i did make some input mistakes, this looks better
http://imgur.com/eVRwQ

EDIT*
Nope wrong again, this should be the correct equation http://imgur.com/bJ19e
Hannibal123
#10
Dec19-12, 08:09 PM
P: 19
this is the equation of place (if that is the correct term in english) as far as I am concerned the height is not suposed to be negative to positive time values???
http://imgur.com/CxAYC
haruspex
#11
Dec19-12, 09:54 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
P: 9,644
Your velocity time graph shows velocity +ve at time 0, so the distance time graph should show distance increasing at time 0.
Hannibal123
#12
Dec20-12, 05:29 AM
P: 19
Indeed it should, however it dosen't. Is this a wrong integration of the velocity equation?
http://imgur.com/A6BKT
Based on the gaph it does not seem to be correct.
Hannibal123
#13
Dec20-12, 09:14 AM
P: 19
Just found the correct place equation i think
http://imgur.com/quiLu
can you see a good way to shoten it?
haruspex
#14
Dec20-12, 03:21 PM
Homework
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks ∞
P: 9,644
Looks right. I'd write it as
[itex]\frac{mg}{k}\left(-t+\left(\frac{m}{k}+\frac{v_0}{g}\right)\left(1-e^{-\frac{kt}{m}}\right)\right)[/itex]


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Equation of motion with drag and external forces Calculus & Beyond Homework 6
Projectile motion with air resistance proportional to velocity Advanced Physics Homework 3
Equation of motion with linear acceleration and velocity-squared drag Introductory Physics Homework 7
The force of drag is proportional to velocity? General Physics 5
Simple Harmonic Motion. Why is Acceleration proportional to NEGATIVE displacement? General Physics 4