
#1
Jan213, 12:30 PM

P: 915

1. can a single particle entangle with itself?
2. In a single particle, double slit experiment, is there any evidence of the wavefunctions entangling with each other? 3. what is the relationship between coherence and entanglement? in case of a single particle 



#2
Jan213, 12:41 PM

P: 178

2. Not entirely sure what you mean, but the particles in flight are not selfentangled. 3. Coherence in a tensor factor space (here: spin, position) depends on the degree of entanglement. Tracing over the other factor space gives you a density matrix that describes the state in the remaining factor space. For a completely entangled system the result is an incoherent, nonpure state. 



#3
Jan213, 03:34 PM

P: 397

From macroscopic view, entanglement is a statistic correlation between different particles. For a single particle, its state is always correlated with itself with probability 100%. From quantum mechanics view, entanglement is synchronization of wavefunction phase. For a single particle, its phase is always synchronized with itself and the phase shift equals zero.




#4
Jan213, 04:06 PM

P: 178

can a particle entangle with itself? 



#5
Jan213, 05:10 PM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 5,146

Not trying to take a side here, though I would point out: A particle detected here cannot be there as well. So in that sense, you can have entanglement from a single particle a two different points in spacetime. It is possible to arrange it so you have a certainty of detecting a particle here or there, with the outcome itself not predetermined*. That is a true superposition, and will act accordingly. You might not be able to do any amazing tricks that way**, but it is nonetheless a form of entanglement if you are sufficiently liberal on the use of the term.
* A beam splitter comes to mind. ** On the other hand, maybe you can. 



#6
Jan313, 06:01 AM

P: 109





#7
Jan313, 07:32 AM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 2,132

The usual SternGerlach experiment, often used as a very nice example to introduce the basic concepts of quantum theory, provides a state, where spin and position of a single particle are entangled.
The trick is to direct a beam of particles, described by a Schrödingerwave packet, towards an inhomogeneous magnetic field. The force affecting the particle's trajectory is proportional to the spin component in direction of the magnetic field and thus you can well separate particles in space with different spin components in this direction. In other words, the incoming beam splits into well separated partial beams depending on its spin component. In this way you are (nearly) 100% sure that a particle in one of the partial beams has a certain value of this spin component. That means, the particle's position is entangled with the spin component. 



#8
Jan313, 08:05 AM

P: 109

Let's say we identify the slit that particle is passed, by measuring electron's spin, (or by measuring the polarization of light) then, spin is entangled with position, when we put the measuring device in front of the slits. Consequently, when we know the spin, we know the position, and it destroys the wavelike uncertainty in position (destroys interference pattern) same as we destroy the information when measuring entangled particles. I had heard that in doubleslit exp., measurement device becomes entangled with particle. Then, that is not true. What's happening is, measurement device creates entanglement between spin and position of the particle. (like BBO crystal creates entangled particles) Right? 



#9
Jan713, 11:08 AM

P: 915




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
How do you entangle particles?  Quantum Physics  0  
Are there other options to entangle photons?  Quantum Physics  0  
How do you entangle particles?  Quantum Physics  21  
How do you entangle photons?  Quantum Physics  4  
could you entangle a charmed meson?  Quantum Physics  1 