Shedding some light on the dot product

AI Thread Summary
The dot product of two vectors A and B is commutative, meaning A . B equals B . A. When finding the components of vector V in the direction of vector W, the order of the vectors in the dot product does not matter. However, to determine the component of V along W, one must multiply V by the unit vector of W, not just use the dot product. The magnitude of this projection is calculated as V . W divided by the magnitude of W. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately analyzing vector components in geometry.
cytochrome
Messages
163
Reaction score
3
The dot product A . B is the magnitude of vector A times the projection of B onto A.

B . A is the magnitude of vector B times the projection of A onto B.

Correct?

A . B = B . A and this makes sense. But, say you're trying to find the components of a vector V in the direction of a vector W. Would it matter whether or not you wrote V . W or W . V?

EDIT: Also, does anyone know what it means (geometrically speaking) to find the components of a vector in the direction of another vector? I can give an example from a book if needed.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To the first question, no it wouldn't matter. The dot product is commutative so ##\vec{V} \cdot \vec{W} = \vec{W} \cdot \vec{V}## for any vectors V and W.

To the edit, imagine you have your vector lying in the plane. Now imagine it is the hypotenuse of a right triangle where one of the sides of the triangle is parallel to the x-axis and the other side is parallel to the y-axis. The component of the main vector (which remember is represented as the hypotenuse) in the x direction is the length of the side of the triangle parallel to the x-axis, and the same for the y direction.
 
cytochrome said:
The dot product A . B is the magnitude of
A . B = B . A and this makes sense. But, say you're trying to find the components of a vector V in the direction of a vector W. Would it matter whether or not you wrote V . W or W . V?

It does not matter which way you write. But none of them will give you the component of V along the direction of W.
You need to multiply V by the unit vector along W.
So the magnitude of the projection is given by V.W/W
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top