What is the Matter with Matter?

  • Thread starter FredJR
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Matter
In summary, the physical property that "matter" has that distinguishes it from "anti-matter" is that only left handed fermions and right handed anti-fermions experience the weak force.
  • #1
FredJR
4
0
Physicists often remark about the absence of antimatter in the universe. My question here sounds simple, but the answer has proved elusive to me. Perhaps someone here can shed some light.

The question is: What is the physical property that "matter" has that distinguishes it from "anti-matter"?

The universe around us is made up of what we call "matter" which is essentially a couple of quark types (u and d) and a lepton type (e). So my question can be rephrased as:
"What physical property does the lepton 'e' share with the quarks 'u' and 'd' that gets them all in the same group (matter) and their anti particles classed as anti-matter?"

Particle Physics says we have 24 fermions (spin half particles). Each fermion has an anti-fermion. Each fermion also has its weak isopsin partner (the particle you get if you add or remove a W+/- as appropriate. Eg u->d when you emit a W+ or e->neutrino when you emit a W-. etc.). But that doesn't say which of the fermions is matter and which is anti-matter.

The fermions are split into those that experience the strong force (quarks and anti quarks) and those that don't (leptons and anti-leptons). The grouping of the electron with the up and down quarks into "matter" spans this. But what is the property?

The Standard Model of Electro -Weak interactions says that only left handed fermions and right handed anti-fermions experience the weak force. I've heard this used as an argument to group left handed electrons and left handed up and down quarks etc. However theory applies to zero mass particles. I can accept that this can be used in the lepton regime where the neutrinos are effectively massless so even though the charged leptons are massive there is one component -the neutrino- which is massless. However in the quark regime all the fermions have mass.

So can anyone explain to me what is the property that the electron and its associated leptons have that gets them grouped with the 'up' quark rather than the anti-up quark? Other than its statistically large representation within the observed universe, which is not a property of the particle itself.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
So can anyone explain to me what is the property that the electron and its associated leptons have that gets them grouped with the 'up' quark rather than the anti-up quark?
It's because, contrary to appearances, QCD and electroweak theory are not completely independent of one another. This requires the particles to be related. A world with leptons without baryons could not exist. The standard model is renormalizable only thanks to anomaly cancellation. Fermions come in three generations, and for each generation certain conditions must be satisfied. One is that the sum of the charges in each generation must be zero. (A quark counts as three particles, due to the three colors.)

0 = 3(2/3) + 3(-1/3) + (0) + (-1)

The second condition is quadratic:

0 = 3(2/3)2 - 3(-1/3)2 + (0)2 - (-1)2

Thus the charged lepton that goes with the up and down quarks must be negatively charged.
 
  • #3
A particle is an antiparticle if it annihilates with another particle.

The distinction of calling one kind matter and the other antimatter is a historical accident.
A distinction has been found in terms of CP violations... it's just not normally how we tell them apart.

Strictly speaking it is accurate to say that an electron is the antiparticle of a positron.

I don't think many people outside science fiction refer to a positron as "antimatter" though we may say that it is an anti-electron... I can't think of a reason you cannot call an electron an anti-positron.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiparticle
 
  • #4
Thanks Simon Bridge for your answer. I don't think you quite got the bit I was stuchk at, maybe my question wasn't well worded. However Bill_K managed to work out what I was looking for and provide and answer. I'll read up on my QCD.

Thanks to both of you for your answers.

Regards
 
  • #5
Yeah - I was fishing ;)
Glad Bill_K could help.
 

1. What is matter?

Matter is anything that has mass and takes up space. It is the physical substance that makes up the universe, including all living and non-living things.

2. What are the different states of matter?

The three main states of matter are solid, liquid, and gas. Solids have a fixed shape and volume, liquids have a fixed volume but can change shape, and gases have neither a fixed shape nor volume.

3. What is the difference between physical and chemical properties of matter?

Physical properties of matter can be observed and measured without changing the substance, such as color, density, and melting point. Chemical properties describe how matter reacts with other substances, such as flammability and reactivity.

4. What is the smallest unit of matter?

The smallest unit of matter is an atom, which is composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons. Atoms combine to form molecules, which make up all matter in the universe.

5. How is matter related to energy?

Matter and energy are closely related and can be converted into each other. For example, matter can be converted into energy through nuclear reactions, and energy can be converted into matter through pair production. The law of conservation of mass and energy states that the total amount of both in a closed system remains constant.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top