Classical Optics by Eugene Hecht | Buy on Amazon

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
AI Thread Summary
Hecht's "Optics" has established itself as a standard textbook for introductory optics courses, particularly for college juniors and seniors. Users appreciate its comprehensive coverage and the inclusion of numerous exercises, with solutions for odd-numbered problems available at the back. However, some find the text overly verbose, making it less effective as a concise reference. While it is valued for its thorough explanations, alternatives like Schaum's Outline for Optics are noted for being more straightforward and easier to navigate for quick information. Overall, Hecht's book is recommended for problem-solving practice but may not suit all learners due to its length and complexity.

For those who have used this book


  • Total voters
    8
Messages
19,788
Reaction score
10,738

User comments:
  • Redbelly98:
    Over the last 30 or so years, this has become a standard textbook for an introductory optics course typically taken by college juniors or seniors. I often refer to it to refresh my background since using it for a course in 1987.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I used this book for my lower level undergraduate Optics course. I liked it a lot. From what I remember it covers a lot for a first course on optics, has neat explanations and many problems (if I remember well, the solution to odd numbered problems are in the back of the book). I have not found any better book for an introduction to optics.
 
Despite having taken 2 optics courses I never got much use out of this one, which was one of the recommended texts. I thought it was way too verbose and not concise at all.

I hear the schaum's outline for optics (same author) is very good though.
 
Just like Lavabug, I found the text very verbose. The figures found throughout the text are informative, though. There is a good selection of problems.

I would not use this text as a reference, but would use it to brush up on problem solving.
 
Lavabug said:
...

I hear the schaum's outline for optics (same author) is very good though.

I kinda agree, the book is good, but I find the Schaum's more appealing and easier to find needed information.
 
I agree that Hecht's Optics is far too wordy. That being said, however, I found it explained (most) concepts well, if in a wordy manner. I definitely appreciated the large number of exercises!
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
14K
Replies
15
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Back
Top