Thin wall Pressure Vessel(cylinder)

  • Thread starter Thread starter MotoPayton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure Wall
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about thin-walled pressure vessels, the focus is on the normal stress along the radial direction, which is assumed to be equal to the internal pressure P at the inner wall and zero at the outer wall. A question arises regarding the presence of shear forces due to the linear decrease of normal stress from P to 0, suggesting that a shear force should exist to balance this change. The response indicates that shear forces are often neglected in thin-walled assumptions because they are significantly smaller than the normal stresses involved. This neglect is justified as the shear forces do not substantially affect the overall stress distribution in thin-walled cylinders compared to thick-walled solutions, where shear forces are more relevant. The discussion encourages further exploration of thick-walled solutions to understand the transition to thin-walled behavior.
MotoPayton
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
cylindrical pressure vessel with inner pressure P.

Take a infinitesimal cube on the inner-wall of the vessel. When calculating the normal stress along the radial direction it is assumed that that it is equal to P on the both the negative \widehat{r} and positive \widehat{r} directions.

For an outer wall infinitesimal cube it is assumed that the normal stresses in radial directions are zero.

I was told in class that the normal stress in the radial direction will decrease linearly from P to 0 along the thin wall.

My question is this: If the pressure is slowly decreasing in radial direction shouldn't there be a shear force to compensate for the fact that that normal stress is decreasing. So for the infinitesimal cube on the inner wall I picture the face in negative \widehat{r} direction to have Pressure P and the face on the positive \widehat{r} direction to have pressure P-dP. This change in pressure should cause a shearing force on the 4 faces normal to the \widehat{r} direction in the negative \widehat{r} direction.

Why is this shear force neglected. If it is because it is so small compared to the pressure stresses so it is neglected then can someone explain to me why it is small. It can't reason why this force would be of such small magnitude when the shear forces must compensate for this Pressure over the small distance of the thin wall.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It is not neglected in the thick wall solution, so look up the thick wall solution and see how it reduces to the thin wall solution when the ratio of the thickness to the radius decreases. From the thick wall solution, you can calculate all the stress components at all locations. Play with the results.

chet
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'What type of toilet do I have?'
I was enrolled in an online plumbing course at Stratford University. My plumbing textbook lists four types of residential toilets: 1# upflush toilets 2# pressure assisted toilets 3# gravity-fed, rim jet toilets and 4# gravity-fed, siphon-jet toilets. I know my toilet is not an upflush toilet because my toilet is not below the sewage line, and my toilet does not have a grinder and a pump next to it to propel waste upwards. I am about 99% sure that my toilet is not a pressure assisted...
After over 25 years of engineering, designing and analyzing bolted joints, I just learned this little fact. According to ASME B1.2, Gages and Gaging for Unified Inch Screw Threads: "The no-go gage should not pass over more than three complete turns when inserted into the internal thread of the product. " 3 turns seems like way to much. I have some really critical nuts that are of standard geometry (5/8"-11 UNC 3B) and have about 4.5 threads when you account for the chamfers on either...
Back
Top