What's the physical interpretation of ρ for dipole forbidden channel?

zhdx
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Consider we have a \Lambda type three level system, the one upper level is denoted by 3, and the two lower levels are denoted by 1 and 2. Assuming that the transitions between 1\leftrightarrow3 and 2\leftrightarrow3 are dipole alowed, while the transition between two lower states 1 and 2 is dipole forbidden. As we know the real and imaginary part of ρ31 describe the dispersion and absorption of the external light in 1\leftrightarrow3 channel. But what does the ρ12 mean?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The same thing.

Dipole-forbidden means that the electric dipole moment vanishes. Higher order multipole transitions (E.g. quadrupole) can still occur, but the matrix elements and thus the transition probabilities are much lower. Therefore the electric dipole is usually very dominant, and if the dipole is allowed, then all other transitions can be neglected. The net effect is that the 1-2 transitions are very weak (but still not completely forbidden)= the 2 state has a very long lifetime.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Does the ρ12 has relation to the population distributions?

M Quack said:
The net effect is that the 1-2 transitions are very weak (but still not completely forbidden)= the 2 state has a very long lifetime.
Thanks!
Does the ρ12 has relation to the population distributions? Say consider two cases:
Case 1: ρ11=0.9, ρ22=0.1
Case 2: ρ11=0.1, ρ22=0.2
What I've found is that the ρ12 in Case 2 is much less than in Case 1. (I've add a dephasing constant γ2d for level 2 compared to level 1.)
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top