What gives the charge of particle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter us40
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Particle
AI Thread Summary
Charge is a fundamental property of certain particles, with protons and electrons having positive and negative charges, respectively, while neutrons and neutrinos are electrically neutral. Protons and neutrons are composed of quarks, where up quarks carry a +2/3 charge and down quarks a -1/3 charge, resulting in protons having a +1 charge and neutrons having no net charge. The origin of these charges remains unexplained by the Standard Model, similar to the lack of explanation for particle masses. While the Higgs mechanism describes how particles acquire mass, it does not clarify why particles possess specific charges. Ultimately, the reasons behind the charges of quarks and the nature of fundamental particles like electrons and neutrinos remain unknown.
us40
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
why some particles like proton and electron have positive and nagetive charge while neutron and neutrino are electrically neutral??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Charge is a fundamental property of certain particles. There is no underlying reason why these charges exist. We simply observe that they do.

Also, protons and neutrons are made up of quarks. Up quarks have +2/3 charge, while down quarks have -1/3 charge. Since protons have 2 up quarks and 1 down quark they have +1 charge. Neutrons have two down quarks and one up quark, leading to no net charge. Electrons and neutrinos are fundamental particles and simply have -1 and zero charge respectively.
 
Drakkith said:
Charge is a fundamental property of certain particles. There is no underlying reason why these charges exist. We simply observe that they do.

Also, protons and neutrons are made up of quarks. Up quarks have +2/3 charge, while down quarks have -1/3 charge. Since protons have 2 up quarks and 1 down quark they have +1 charge. Neutrons have two down quarks and one up quark, leading to no net charge. Electrons and neutrinos are fundamental particles and simply have -1 and zero charge respectively.
but we can say same thing for mass but we can find higgs mechanism by raising this type of question why some particle have mass and other are massless.and since wimps are electrically neutral we can understand their nature by charge giving mechanism and so nature of dark matter.
 
The higgs mechanism does not explain why particles have the masses they have, it only explains how it works. Much like electromagnetism explains how charges interact but not why each particle has the charge that it has.
 
us40 said:
why some particles like proton and electron have positive and nagetive charge while neutron and neutrino are electrically neutral??

Just so you know, a "proton" and a "neutron" are not elementary particles, while electron and neutrino are. So there is a "reason" why proton and neutron have the charges (or lack of charges) that they do (quark content). But then, you can always ask why the quarks have those charges, very much like the electron and neutrino.

The short answer is, we do not know. The Standard Model of elementary particles currently does not have an origin or a mechanism for the origin of charges, the same way it doesn't explain the origin of spins quantum number. There are many things in our universe in which the quantities have no underlying or more fundamental explanation (speed of light, fine structure constants, etc.. etc.).

Zz.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top