Is the energy density normalized differently in the quantum case?

Hypersphere
Messages
189
Reaction score
8
Hi all,

This is all in the context of interaction between (two-level) atoms and an electromagnetic field, basically the Wigner-Weisskopf model. In particular, I tried to derive the value of the atom-field interaction constant and show that it satisfied
|g_\mathbf{k}|^2=\frac{\omega_\mathbf{k}}{2\hbar \epsilon_0 V} \left( d^2 \cos^2 \theta \right)
where d is the dipole moment and \theta is the angle between the dipole moment and the polarization vector.

http://www.stanford.edu/~rsasaki/AP387/chap6 claim that the vacuum field amplitude satisfy the normalization
\int \epsilon_0 E^2 d^3r = \frac{\hbar \omega}{2}
which does lead to the above form of |g|^2, but from classical electrodynamics (eg. eq. (6.106) in Jackson, 3rd ed.) I'm used to defining the energy density of the electric field as
u_E=\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_0 E^2

Now, the notes seem to use a energy density that is 2u_E. Is there a good explanation for this, or does it boil down to one of these conventions? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, the author of those notes probably just switched to a complex field
E_V=\sqrt{\frac{\epsilon_0}{2}}E + i\frac{B}{\sqrt{2\mu_0}}
in which case the energy density comes out as
u=\int |E_V|^2 d^3 r = \int \left( \frac{\epsilon_0}{2}E^2 + \frac{B^2}{2\mu_0} \right) d^3 r
as it should.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top