Piezoelectric transformer efficiency

AI Thread Summary
The efficiency of piezoelectric transformers can exceed the electromechanical coupling factor due to the way energy is converted and utilized within the system. The coupling factor, typically around 0.7, represents the ratio of electrical to mechanical energy that can be harvested, while the transformer can achieve efficiencies over 90%. This discrepancy arises because the coupling factor does not account for losses; instead, it reflects performance characteristics like voltage transformation. The piezoelectric material vibrates at mechanical resonance, allowing for effective energy transfer despite the limitations of the coupling factor. Overall, the piezoelectric transformer's design enables high efficiency through careful management of energy conversion and losses.
EE4life
Messages
63
Reaction score
2
Dear all,

How is the efficiency of piezoelectric transformer higher than electromechanical coupling factor?

Thank you,
Husain
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
EE4life said:
Dear all,

How is the efficiency of piezoelectric transformer higher than electromechanical coupling factor?

Thank you,
Husain

Could you define your terms and say more about what you are asking? Can you post a link to the information that you are asking about?
 
Here is some detailed info on the piezo transformer http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slyt107/slyt107.pdf

In short, a piezoelectric transformer is a piezoelectric material that has a two sets of electrodes, a output and input set. Voltage at the mechanical resonance is introduced at the input. The entire device vibrates. The piezoelectric material between the output electrodes also vibrates. A impedance load is placed across the output to draw power out. In effect, the whole system behaves electrically like a transformer.

The electromechanical coupling factor is the ratio between electrical energy and the mechanical energy which can be harvested from the material, and visa versa. The coupling factor is typically 0.7 or less, but they transformation of power has an efficiency of 90% plus.

Please note that the coupling factor is not a loss factor. For more details on the coupling factor see:
https://www.americanpiezo.com/knowledge-center/piezo-theory/piezoelectric-constants.html
 
The electromechanical coupling factor, k, is for free deflection. Here, the piezoelectric primary is constrained vertically to maximize the force on the secondary.

From http://www.piezo.com/tech2intropiezotrans.html

Free deflection (Xf) refers to displacement attained at the maximum recommended voltage level when the actuator is completely free to move and is not asked to exert any force. Blocked force (Fb) refers to the force exerted at the maximum recommended voltage level when the actuator is totally blocked and not allowed to move.

tech2intropiezotrans08.gif
 
My inclination for the answer is that k depends on the open circuit elastic compliance, while the short circuit compliance is used when electrically driving the ceramic and when extracting the output power.

I think I maybe asking a too specialized question.
 
I think I understand it. Only considering the PZT transformer, losses account for the efficiency, and k accounts for the other performance characteristics such as step up/step down voltages.

k is an energy conversion factor, not a loss conversion factor. The electrical energy not converted to mechanical energy is stored as electrical energy. In the case of the oscillator/piezo transformer, power in=power out is conserved except for the losses. If k was the efficiency, then the electrical oscillation power would need to continuously increase, which is wrong because of power conservation.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top