Determining quantities as vectors or not

AI Thread Summary
Some quantities are classified as vectors while others are scalars based on their mathematical definitions and physical interpretations. Current density is considered a vector because it describes the flow of charge per unit area, incorporating both magnitude and direction. In contrast, current is treated as a scalar since it represents the total charge flowing through a conductor over time, lacking a directional component. This distinction is not arbitrary but rooted in the dimensional differences between the two quantities. Understanding these classifications helps clarify the underlying principles of physics and simplifies the equations used in analysis.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
Why are some quantities vectors while others aren't? For example, we can calculate both current and current density, but why do we only consider current density to be a vector and current a scalar quantity? Is it a purely arbitrary convention or is it something more mathematically fundamental? I understand vectors like forces and displacement have directions and magnitudes associated with them, but I don't quite understand why we don't do the same thing for quantities like current? Is it to simplify equations only?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Current is a vector. The difference between current and current density is the dimensions of the vector. Current density is current per cross sectional area, or number of charges moving through a volume, while current is descriptive of charges moving along a line.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
48
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
44
Views
4K
Back
Top