Solution for equation of 2,3,4, degree

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jhenrique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding roots of polynomial equations of degrees two, three, four, and five by transforming them into specific forms. The author presents a method for rewriting cubic equations and derives a formula for the roots based on coefficients. The transformation involves substituting variables and comparing coefficients to establish relationships between the original and transformed equations. The conclusion suggests a formula for the roots of cubic equations, but the forum moderator notes that original research is not permitted in the discussion. For further information on cubic functions, a reference to Wikipedia is provided.
Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
I noticed that is always possible to find the roots of polynomials of kind:
##A\lambda^2 + B##
##A\lambda^3 + B##
##A\lambda^4 + B##
##A\lambda^5 + B##

So I thought to transform the quadratic, the cubic, the quartic and the quintic function in the forms above, look:

##ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0##

##(x=\lambda+u+v)##

##a(\lambda+u+v)^3+b(\lambda+u+v)^2+c(\lambda+u+v)+d=0##

##\\a \left ( \begin{matrix}
\lambda^3 & +3\lambda^2u & +3\lambda u^2 & +u^3\\
+3\lambda^2v & +6\lambda u v & +3u^2 v & \\
+3\lambda v^2 & +3uv^2 & & \\
+v^3 & & & \\
\end{matrix} \right )

+ b \left ( \begin{matrix}
\lambda^2 & +2\lambda u & +u^2\\
+2\lambda v & +2 u v & \\
+v^2 & &
\end{matrix} \right )

+ c (\lambda + u + v) + d = 0##

##a\lambda^3+(3a(u+v)+b)\lambda^2+(3a(u+v)^2 + 2b(u+v) + c)\lambda + (a(u+v)^3 + b(u+v)^2 + c(u+v) + d) = 0##

So, comparing the equations:

##A\lambda^3 + B = a\lambda^3+(3a(u+v)+b)\lambda^2+(3a(u+v)^2 + 2b(u+v) + c)\lambda + (a(u+v)^3 + b(u+v)^2 + c(u+v) + d) = 0##

implies that:
##\begin{cases}
A=a\\
0=(3a(u+v)+b)\\
0=(3a(u+v)^2 + 2b(u+v) + c)\\
B=(a(u+v)^3 + b(u+v)^2 + c(u+v) + d)\\
\end{cases}##

So,
##A\lambda^3 + B = 0\;\;\;\Rightarrow\;\;\;\;\lambda = \sqrt[3]{\frac{-B}{A}} \;\;\;\Rightarrow\;\;\;\; x-u-v = \sqrt[3]{\frac{-B}{A}} \;\;\;\Rightarrow\;\;\;\; x = \sqrt[3]{\frac{-B}{A}} + (u+v)\;\;\;\Rightarrow\;\;\;\; x = \sqrt[3]{\frac{-(a(u+v)^3 + b(u+v)^2 + c(u+v) + d)}{a}} + (u+v)##

Happens that
##0=3a(u+v)+b\;\;\;\Rightarrow\;\;\;\;u+v = \frac{-b}{3a}##

Conclusion:
x=\sqrt[3]{\frac{d}{a}-\frac{2b^3}{3^3a^3}-\frac{bc}{3a^2}}-\frac{b}{3a}

This ideia is correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top