What is measurement unit of digital clear sound for devices

AI Thread Summary
The measurement unit for digital clear sound in devices is referred to as a "sampling" or "sample," which captures the pitch and volume attributes of sound at specific moments. The standard sampling rate for CD-quality audio is 44,100 samples per second for stereo channels. Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) is also highlighted as a key measure of an audio device's linearity and clarity. While digital audio involves Analog-to-Digital and Digital-to-Analog conversions, the fundamental measures of sound clarity remain consistent with analog methods. This discussion emphasizes that the topic is rooted in audio engineering rather than physics.
taregg
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
like for example digital unit measurement for clear images in devices is ...pixel
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The analogous unit of information for audio would be a "sampling" or "sample". That's the smallest unit of sound information in an audio stream and represents an approximation of the pitch and volume attributes of a sound at a moment in time. The sampling rate called "CD quality" today is sampled at 44,100 times per second for two (stereo) channels.
 
I think the answer you probably wanted was: Total Harmonic Distortion, which is a measure of how linear an audio device is. In the digital audio age, there will be an intervening Analog-to-Digital, and Digital-to-Analog conversion process, but the measure of linearity / clarity is essentially the same as it was in the era of analog sound.

Strictly speaking, this is an audio engineering question, not one of physics.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top