What is the formal definition of reactivity and how can it be quantified?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Murtuza Tipu
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of reactive species in chemistry, emphasizing that reactivity is distinct from energy levels. Reactive species often have high kinetic constants and can lead to further reactions, but their free energy may be low. The inquiry seeks a formal theory or quantitative definition of reactivity, questioning whether it is possible to assign a numerical value to a species' reactivity in various environments. Understanding reactivity requires knowledge of molecular orbital theory, where free electrons tend to bond to achieve lower energy states. The term "reactivity" lacks a standardized comparative measure, as a species may react vigorously with one substance while being inert with another, depending on environmental conditions. The discussion also touches on reaction kinetics, noting that high reactivity correlates with low activation energy for reactions. Overall, a deeper theoretical understanding and computational tools are necessary to quantify and predict reactivity effectively.
Murtuza Tipu
Messages
47
Reaction score
2
I understand the concept of a reactive species on a sort of vague and intuitive level: a reactive species is one that has lots of reactions that it can participate in. These tend to have large kinetic constants, be thermodynamically downhill and often have products that are also reactive, leading to knock-on effects. But reactivity isn't the same as energy, and it's possible to have highly reactive species with relatively low free energies and vice versa.

I'm interested in whether there's any kind of formal theory of reactivity, and/or a quantitative definition of the concept. For example, we're often told that free radicals are reactive because they have an unpaired electron and they "want" to fill their outer shell. This makes perfect sense on an intuitive level, but I'd like to know if it can be taken further. Is there some way we can write down an equation that will tell us how reactive a species will be in a given environment, or is there some way we can measure a species' reactivity empirically and use it to make predictions?

In particular, what does it really mean to say that one species is more or less reactive than another? Can we put a number to it and say that a species has a reactivity of 8.2 on some meaningful scale?

thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
To understand reactivity you pretty much need to look at Molecular orbital theory.

In a nutshell, the free electrons "want" to bond as by bonding they fall in a lower energy state. If the bond results in a higher energy state they will not "want" to bond and the bond will be unstable, as the direction is from higher to lower energy states.

Intuition does not help much here, you will need to understand the theory and then there are computer programs that help, as the math is an eyesore.

For a reactive species to be more or less reactive, that does not mean anything really. It is not a term for comparison as by modifying the conditions you can easily get mixed results. A reactive species could react violently to something and be mostly inert to others. A simple example is Na+H2O and Na+alkane, where Sodium's reactivity with water does not mean anything for alkanes which do react with other species.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CgLh9_f5ns&list=PL50CC04CE699FF4B3
I do make too much advertising to these courses, but they are quite good for beginners (like me).
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top