Register to reply

Problem with Spherical Surface Integral

by Noone1982
Tags: integral, spherical, surface
Share this thread:
Noone1982
#1
Oct6-05, 10:16 AM
P: 83
[tex]A\; =\; 4\dot{r}\; +\; 3\dot{\theta }\; -\; 2\dot{\phi }[/tex]

Now the surface integral integral is:

[tex]\int_{}^{}{\left( ?\times A \right)\; \; da} [/tex]

(the ? mark is a del operator and the dot over a variable means a unit vector)

[tex]?\times A\; =\frac{\dot{r}}{r\sin \theta }\left[ \frac{\partial }{\partial \theta }\left( \sin \theta A_{\phi } \right)\; -\; \frac{\partial A_{\theta }}{\partial \phi } \right]\; +\; \frac{\dot{\theta }}{r}\left[ \frac{1}{\sin \theta }\frac{\partial A_{r}}{\partial \phi }\; -\; \frac{\partial }{\partial r}\left( rA_{\phi } \right) \right]\; +\; \frac{\dot{\phi }}{r}\left[ \frac{\partial }{\partial r}\left( rA_{\theta } \right)\; -\; \frac{\partial A_{r}}{\partial \theta } \right] [/tex]

I get:

[tex]?\times A\; =\frac{\dot{r}}{r\sin \theta }\left[ \left( -2\cos \theta \right)\; -\; 0 \right]\; +\; \frac{\dot{\theta }}{r}\left[ \frac{1}{\sin \theta }\left( 0 \right)\; +\; 2 \right]\; +\; \frac{\dot{\phi }}{r}\left[ 3\; -0 \right][/tex]

Now I dot this to da

where da is:

[tex]da\; =\; r^{2}\sin \theta \; d\theta \; d\phi \; \dot{r}\; +\; r\sin \theta \; dr\; d\phi \; \dot{\theta }\; +\; r\; dr\; d\theta \; \dot{\phi }[/tex]

I get:

[tex]\int_{}^{}{\int_{}^{}{}}-2\cos \theta r\; d\theta \; d\phi \; \; +\; \int_{}^{}{\int_{}^{}{}}2\sin \theta \; dr\; d\phi \; +\int_{0}^{ro}{\int_{\frac{\pi }{2}}^{\frac{\pi }{2}}{}}3\; dr\; d\theta \; [/tex]

which equals:

[tex]-2\sin \theta r\phi \; +\; 2\sin \theta r\phi \; +\; \frac{3}{2}\pi r_{o}\; =\; \frac{3}{2}\pi r_{o}[/tex]

The answer should be

[tex]-\pi r_{0}[/tex]
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Wildfires and other burns play bigger role in climate change, professor finds
SR Labs research to expose BadUSB next week in Vegas
New study advances 'DNA revolution,' tells butterflies' evolutionary history
StatusX
#2
Oct6-05, 06:06 PM
HW Helper
P: 2,566
You can't integrate over the spherical basis vectors because they change with position. You need to transform the vectors into cartesian coordinates.
Tom Mattson
#3
Oct6-05, 06:46 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Tom Mattson's Avatar
P: 5,533
He doesn't need to change basis, he just messed up his LaTeX. There are supposed to be dot products among the basis vectors in there. So while [itex]\hat{r}[/itex] does depend on position, [itex]\hat{r}\cdot\hat{r}[/itex] does not.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Sliding Down a Spherical Surface Introductory Physics Homework 4
Iterated Integral Surface Area Problem (with Polor Coordinates) Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Surface Integral HW problem Introductory Physics Homework 3
Refraction at a spherical surface Introductory Physics Homework 1