- #1
stephenwlin
- 9
- 0
Here's an idea I came up with recently, that I wanted to share:
No true black holes exist. Every "apparent" event horizon is really
a separation of two universes, where the outside universe is
entangled geometrically with the inside universe. The Hubble
volume is sitting inside of an expanding supermassive black hole,
of another universe. However, by generalization of the uncertainty
principle, this implies that the "outside universe" is "really"
simultaneously in a superposition of a large but countably
finite many possible universes (i.e. bitstates), with the net
information between the "inside" and "outside" views cancelling out to
zero. Equivalently, every "classical" black hole is really in a
microscopic superposition of countably finite many bitstates, again
with the net information "inside" and "outside" cancelling zero.
However, it cannot converge to a singularity, because it cannot encode
"bitstates" forever in the same volume, therefore it must leak
information in the form of "photons" (i.e. Hawking radiation).
Equivalently, the Hubble volume receives information one photon at a
time from the "outside" in the form of cosmic background radiation,
that information being about the prior state of the otherwise causally
disconnected universe. (i.e. CMB == Hawking radiation). The
equivalence principle between these two views implies length
contraction and time dilation around gravitational bodies. Gravity
between photons is the single fundamental force of the universe.
All other sources of apparent information and causal connectivity
(i.e. all other forces) are the result of the initial state of the universe
at the Big Bang, the only true singularity: the other fundamental
particles and forces are the result of bundles of photons taking different
paths through microscopic black holes (i.e. microscopic wormholes),
which exist at every point in 3+1 spacetime.
What does everyone think of this idea?
No true black holes exist. Every "apparent" event horizon is really
a separation of two universes, where the outside universe is
entangled geometrically with the inside universe. The Hubble
volume is sitting inside of an expanding supermassive black hole,
of another universe. However, by generalization of the uncertainty
principle, this implies that the "outside universe" is "really"
simultaneously in a superposition of a large but countably
finite many possible universes (i.e. bitstates), with the net
information between the "inside" and "outside" views cancelling out to
zero. Equivalently, every "classical" black hole is really in a
microscopic superposition of countably finite many bitstates, again
with the net information "inside" and "outside" cancelling zero.
However, it cannot converge to a singularity, because it cannot encode
"bitstates" forever in the same volume, therefore it must leak
information in the form of "photons" (i.e. Hawking radiation).
Equivalently, the Hubble volume receives information one photon at a
time from the "outside" in the form of cosmic background radiation,
that information being about the prior state of the otherwise causally
disconnected universe. (i.e. CMB == Hawking radiation). The
equivalence principle between these two views implies length
contraction and time dilation around gravitational bodies. Gravity
between photons is the single fundamental force of the universe.
All other sources of apparent information and causal connectivity
(i.e. all other forces) are the result of the initial state of the universe
at the Big Bang, the only true singularity: the other fundamental
particles and forces are the result of bundles of photons taking different
paths through microscopic black holes (i.e. microscopic wormholes),
which exist at every point in 3+1 spacetime.
What does everyone think of this idea?
Last edited: