http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051010/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_051010195209"BAGHDAD, Iraq - Iraq has issued arrest warrants against the defense minister and 27 other officials from the U.S.-backed government of former Prime Minister Iyad Allawi over the alleged disappearance or misappropriation of $1 billion in military procurement funds, officials said Monday.
...
This is great. An excellent sign that the new Iraqi government isn't willing to be another US puppet.
So you're saying the interim government was meant to be corrupt? Oh, right.loseyourname said:The interim government wasn't meant to be a shining beacon of democracy. They weren't even elected. It's the government that is coming to be that is supposed to be the shining beacon. This makes it look like they're headed in the right direction.
El Hombre Invisible said:So you're saying the interim government was meant to be corrupt? Oh, right.
loseyourname said:The interim government wasn't meant to be a shining beacon of democracy. They weren't even elected. It's the government that is coming to be that is supposed to be the shining beacon. This makes it look like they're headed in the right direction.
Ah. If you're just arguing against the wording of the OP, yes that seems an error on his part.loseyourname said:Don't read too much into it.
All the more reason to get out of there and let these people govern themselves. It won't be the end of the world if we let the French extract the oil, we can buy it from them as easy as buying it from Chevron.Smurf said:I am. This is great. An excellent sign that the new Iraqi government isn't willing to be another US puppet.
The interim government does reflect upon the administration that put them there however.loseyourname said:The interim government wasn't meant to be a shining beacon of democracy. They weren't even elected. It's the government that is coming to be that is supposed to be the shining beacon. This makes it look like they're headed in the right direction.
It depends on how you define progress. While the Iraq government has made some advancements in terms of stability and security, there are still ongoing issues with corruption and human rights violations. Additionally, the country is still facing challenges in terms of economic development and rebuilding after years of conflict.
The USA's involvement in Iraq has had a significant impact on the current state of the government. The US-led invasion in 2003 led to the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's regime and the establishment of a new government. However, the US's handling of the post-war reconstruction and political processes has been heavily criticized and has contributed to ongoing issues in Iraq.
The USA has played a major role in the decision-making process of the Iraq government since its establishment. The US has provided financial and military support, and has also influenced policies and decisions through diplomatic pressure and aid conditionality. However, the extent of this influence has varied over time and has faced backlash from both Iraqi citizens and the international community.
The opinions of Iraqi citizens towards the USA-backed government are diverse and often depend on individual experiences and perspectives. While some may see the government as a necessary ally for stability, others may view it as a puppet regime controlled by the US. There have also been widespread protests and demonstrations against government corruption and lack of services, which have been met with violence from security forces.
It is difficult to predict the exact long-term consequences of the USA's involvement in the Iraq government, as it is a complex and ongoing situation. However, some potential consequences could include continued tensions and instability in the region, ongoing dependency on foreign aid and influence, and potential backlash from Iraqi citizens if they feel their government is not truly representing their interests. Additionally, the US's involvement in Iraq has also strained relationships with other countries and has had ripple effects on global politics.