Simultaneous diagonalization of two hermitian operators

In summary, the conversation discusses the theorem that states if two hermitian operators commute, there exists a basis of common eigenvectors that diagonalizes them both. The proof first considers the non-degenerate case and then the degenerate case. The conversation also discusses generalizing this concept to an infinite number of mutually commuting operators. The conversation also mentions the use of the spectral decomposition to find the common eigenvectors. It is also mentioned that this concept is related to the active and passive transformations on the basis of the space.
  • #1
y.moghadamnia
23
1
I decided to go over the mathematical introductions of QM again.The text I use is Shankar quantum, and I came across this theorem:
"If [tex]\Omega [/tex] and [tex]\Lambda[/tex] are two commuting hermitain operators, there exists (at least) a basis of common eigenvectors that diagonalizes them both."
in the proof part, they first consider at least one of the operators is nondegenerate, and so they use the fact that they commute, and there's the result: "since every eigenvector of [tex]\Omega[/tex] is an eigenvector of[tex]\Delta[/tex], the basis we have for [tex]\Omega[/tex] (the eigenbasis) will diagonalize both operators."
and then they go over the degenerate part, means if both are degenerate, and there comes by a proof I don't completely understand, but then the conclusion is as the above,
my question is that does above mean if we have two operators and they commute (hermitians) and we suppose the degeneracy is a solved case, one operators eigen vecs and eigenvalues are the othres as well?
and there's another thing, in the end they generalize by this: " in general, one can alwaysm for infinite n, a se of operators that commute with each other and that nail down a unique common eigenbasis, the element s of which maymay be labeled unambiguously as ket ([tex]\varpi[/tex] ,[tex]\lambda[/tex],[tex]\gamma[/tex],...)" that the others are to be the eigenvalues of the other operators.
what does that mean? any examples in QM?
sorry if the above is not so clear, for those who have shankar QM, look at pages 43 to 46.
and for those who dont, here's a link: www.filestube.com/q/quantum+mechanics+shankar
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The simplest way I know is this one: each Hermitian operator A has a spectral decomposition:

[tex]A=\sum_i\lambda_iE_A(i)[/tex]

where [itex]\lambda_i[/itex] are eigenvalues and [itex]E_A(i)[/itex] are orthogonal projection on corresponding eigenspaces. Then comes a little lemma:

[itex] [A,B]=0[/itex] if and only if all [itex]E_A(i)[/itex] commute with all [itex]E_B(j)[/itex].

Now, suppose A and B commute. Then [itex]E_{AB}(i,j)=E_A(i)E_B(j)[/tex] are also projections and [itex]\sum_{i,j}E_{AB}(i,j)=I[/itex]

It is enough to choose any orthonormal basis in each subspace defined by (i,j) and you have orthonormal basis in the whole space consisting of common eigenvectors of both operators. The same method works for any number of mutually commuting operators.

It may sound a little bit abstract, but I think that is the best way of looking at the problem.
 
  • #3
Hello.I am reading Sharkar too, but for the first time. Very glad to talk about sth on what I am trying to understand.
I think the answer to your question is yes. The two commuting hermitian operators have the same eigenbasis. Check p29, the active and passive tranformations. What we do is just to multiply two unitary matrices to the left and rignt side of the operator. That can be seen as a unitary transformation on the basis of the space. Have a review of the proof, he just transforms the basis. In the new basis, the two are diagonalized.
So the eigenbasis is just about the basis of the space, and has nothing to do with the operators.
I am not an English speaker. sorry for grammar mistakes.
 

1. What is simultaneous diagonalization of two hermitian operators?

Simultaneous diagonalization of two hermitian operators is a mathematical technique used in quantum mechanics to find a common set of eigenvectors for two observables (operators) that commute with each other. This allows for the measurement of both observables simultaneously, giving us information about the system being observed.

2. How does simultaneous diagonalization work?

To simultaneously diagonalize two hermitian operators, we first find the eigenvectors and eigenvalues for each operator individually. Then, we look for the common eigenvectors between the two operators. These common eigenvectors will form a basis for both operators, allowing us to represent them as diagonal matrices.

3. Why is simultaneous diagonalization important in quantum mechanics?

Simultaneous diagonalization is important in quantum mechanics because it allows us to measure multiple observables of a system at the same time, giving us a more complete understanding of the system. It also simplifies calculations and makes it easier to analyze the behavior of the system.

4. Can any two hermitian operators be simultaneously diagonalized?

No, not all hermitian operators can be simultaneously diagonalized. For two operators to be simultaneously diagonalized, they must commute with each other, meaning that their order of operations does not matter. If two operators do not commute, they cannot have a common set of eigenvectors and cannot be simultaneously diagonalized.

5. How is simultaneous diagonalization related to the uncertainty principle?

Simultaneous diagonalization is related to the uncertainty principle in that it allows us to measure multiple observables of a system at the same time, reducing the uncertainty in our measurements. However, the uncertainty principle still applies and there will always be some inherent uncertainty in the measurements due to the nature of quantum mechanics.

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
608
Replies
2
Views
619
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top