Register to reply 
If neutrinos are their own antimatter 
Share this thread: 
#1
Jun1014, 10:56 AM

P: 94

This article on Majorana particles:
http://news.yahoo.com/huntsourcema...130052152.html If neutrinos are their own antimatter partners, it could help explain a fundamental mystery of the universe: Why matter exists at all. and If the predictions of the Standard Model — the dominant theory of particle physics that explains subatomic particles — were correct, "you'd expect to produce equal amounts of matter and antimatter" How is it that a neutrino property (own antiparticle? maybe no antiparticle?) causes more matter to be produced then antimatter? 


#2
Jun1014, 12:45 PM

P: 1,048

I am not sure whether what that article says is correct or not.
The main thing with the neutrinoless double beta decay is that in fact you have a production of the extra two electrons...and only... neutrinos annihilate with itself so you have a lepton number violation (2 neutrons for example will give 2 protons and 2 electrons as a final result)... Of course I am not so into that idea because I think the matterantimatter asymmetry should have happened before the formation of nuclei, especially heavy nuclei which seem to be subject in the double beta decays (Germanium for example) with reasonable amount of lifetimes... 


#3
Jun1014, 12:48 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 2,953

I think it would only "help to explain" this, not really explain it very much if you ask me. Neutrinos and antineutrinos being the "same" particle really means that they are different helicity states of one another (technically, since neutrinos do have some mass, it should be different spin states, but neutrinos are so light it's not a huge sin, phenomenologically speaking, to regard them as mass less in many cases). The neutrinos would simply be the lefthanded helicity states and the antineutrinos would be the right handed ones.
It is a known fact that the weak force is lefthanded biased. It violates parity conservation by preferring left handed interactions. In this way, I suppose, one might argue that the matterantimatter disproportion could be partly due to the lefthanded nature of the weak force (a property that is already explained in the standard model). But, and someone chime in here if I'm wrong (which I very well might be!), this wouldn't really help us for the particles which we DO KNOW are NOT Majorana in nature. 


#4
Jun1014, 01:06 PM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 9,488

If neutrinos are their own antimatter
The original article can be found here: http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.6956, Search for Majorana neutrinos with the first two years of EXO200 data. Baryon asymmetry [an excess of matter] can be produced as a consequence of CP [charge parity] violations. This have been observed for quarks, but, not for neutrinos until about a year ago by the T2k collaboration  re: http://t2kexperiment.org/2013/07/ne...ronneutrinos/



#5
Jun1014, 02:53 PM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,160

It just reports oscillations from muon neutrinos to electron neutrinos. How is this any different from the OPERA experiment, which observed the oscillation of muon neutrinos to tau neutrinos? 


#6
Jun1014, 08:55 PM

P: 370

However, chirality makes no sense here either. A Majorana fermion can be thought of as a superposition of both a leftchiral Weyl fermion and a rightchiral Weyl fermion. You need both of them to satisfy the Majorana condition and allow you to write down a Majorana mass. The Majorana condition means that literally the antiparticle is the same thing as the particle. So really, there aren't any antineutrinos if neutrinos are Majorana. They are all just the same particle. There is, however, something I am confused about, and maybe this is what you are talking about. There is of course a difference between the flavour and mass eigenstates of neutrinos. The Majorana neutrinos are the mass eigenstates, if neutrinos are Majorana, but I don't know that this means the flavour eigenstates are also Majorana, or if that even makes sense. The flavour eigenstates may just be described in terms of the Weyl fermions, so that it makes sense to talk about their "antiparticles" being the opposite chirality Weyl fermion, but that these things both mix together in the mass eigenstate. Anyone know a good reference? I found this one explaining basic things about Majorana fermions http://arxiv.org/pdf/1006.1718v2.pdf, but it doesn't have any details about what happens in the Standard Model. 


#7
Jun1114, 05:29 AM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,160

The righthanded flavor states are the ones that are sterile wrt the electroweak interaction, and invariant wrt the electroweak symmetry, so they are the states that can have Majorana masses M. The mass eigenstates are mixtures of both left and righthanded states. In the seesaw model, M >> m_{D}, the Dirac mass, so the mixing angle is very small, and the light eigenstate is predominantly lefthanded, while the predominantly sterile eigenstate is very massive. 


#8
Jun1114, 07:31 AM

Thanks
P: 1,948




#9
Jun1214, 10:00 AM

P: 680

T2K actually adds information on the mixing parameters, unlike OPERA which essentially only confirmed what we already knew from atmospheric oscillation experiments by explicitly confirming that nu_mu actually oscillate into nu_tau. 


#10
Jun1614, 12:10 PM

P: 94




#11
Jun1614, 12:13 PM

P: 94

If a neutrino alternates between these states does that mean the mass of the three different neutrinos are the same? 


#12
Jun1614, 12:43 PM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,160

In any model of massive neutrinos there will be a mass matrix, the PMNS matrix. The basis states are the flavor states (electron, muon, tau). Neutrino mixing follows from the presence of offdiagonal terms in this matrix. The neutrino mass states are the three different eigenstates of the matrix. If the neutrinos are Majorana, you also have to consider mixing between the conjugate states, and instead of a 3x3 matrix you have a 6x6 matrix to diagonalize, and there will be six different masses. Specifically in the seesaw model the eigenstates are predominantly left and righthanded and the righthanded states are very massive. 


#13
Jun1614, 01:01 PM

P: 94




#14
Jun1614, 05:02 PM

P: 680

Furthermore, there is no direct need to go to a 6x6 mass matrix for having Majorana neutrinos, this is simply the case for the type I seesaw. At low energies, the only d=5 operator that you can write down with SM fields is the Weinberg operator, which after EW symmetry breaking gives the 3 lefthanded SM neutrinos a Majorana mass. The Weinberg operator may result from the type I seesaw, but there are also other possible UV completions such as introducing a heavy SU(2) triplet scalar (type II seesaw) or a triplet fermion (type III). To answer zincshows question: No, the seesaw mechanism does not directly imply oscillations although it does allow for them. It would in principle be possible to obtain just diagonal matrices. It would however require that the Yukawas were diagonalizable in the same basis as the righthanded neutrino mass matrix. 


#15
Jun1614, 05:11 PM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,160




#16
Jun1614, 09:45 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 2,953

Mass eigenstates are just that, they are states which diagonalize the vacuum Hamiltonian. The flavor eigenstates are eigenstates of the weak interaction Hamiltonian. That these two sets of eigenstates are not identical with each other is the origin of flavor transformation. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
How much energy is lost due to neutrinos in matterantimatter reaction ?  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  3  
Why Do Neutrinos and AntiNeutrinos Oscillate Differently?  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  2  
What is the difference between neutrinos and antineutrinos?  Quantum Physics  2  
Why cant we tell the mass of electron neutrinos, mu neutrinos, and tau  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  2  
Basics of neutrinos are they antimatter particles  High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics  11 