Register to reply 
A ball falls with no force acting on it 
Share this thread: 
#1
Aug2814, 01:15 AM

P: 42

If you are standing on the earth and you drop a ball, the ball falls to the ground due to the force of gravity acting on it.
Now imagine you are in an upward accelerating elevator in space. You let go of a ball that you are holding in your hand. The ball Is stationary in space, but the elevator floor is accelerating upward and hits the ball. This means that relative to an observer standing on the floor of the elevator, the ball appears to fall to the ground. The ball falls in the exact same way as it does when you are standing on the earth. According to the principle of equivalence, no experiment from inside the elevator can tell whether the ball is falling or whether the elevator is accelerating upward. Therefore, the experience inside an upward accelerating elevator is indistinguishable from the experience of standing on the earth in the earth's gravity. What's strange here is that no force is acting on the ball in the elevator causing it to fall. However, when standing on the earth, the earth's gravity IS acting on the ball causing it to fall. So, how can a ball fall inside an elevator WITH NO FORCE ACTING ON THE BALL? How is this possible? In one situation (standing on the earth), A FORCE is acting on the ball. In the other situation, NO FORCE is acting on the ball. So even though one situation has a force acting on the ball (standing on the earth), and the other situation has no force acting on the ball (elevator), both situations are an identical experience where the ball falls to the ground. How is this possible? 


#2
Aug2814, 01:56 AM

Sci Advisor
P: 2,953

The insight of Einstein is that gravity is not a force, but, rather like the accelerating elevator, simply a redefinition (locally) of what an inertial reference frame is.



#3
Aug2814, 02:06 AM

P: 4,233




#4
Aug2814, 03:31 AM

P: 683

A ball falls with no force acting on it
If the elevator is accelerating, shouldn't it take a force to have the ball not fall? (Because "not falling" means moving with the elevator, which was said to be accelerating.) Newon's law does not say, "forces act on 'falling' objects," because "falling" can be subjective (as your post illustrates). 


#5
Aug2814, 04:04 AM

P: 4,233

To clarify the different explanations:
Newtonian Gravity: The frame of the Earth's surface is inertial (ignoring rotation etc.): The ball accelerates down due to the force of gravity The frame of the accelerating box in space is noninertial: The ball accelerates down due to an inertial force or curvlinear spacetime geometry. General Relativity: Both frames are noninertial: The ball accelerates down due to an inertial force or curvilinear spacetime geometry. 


#6
Aug2814, 12:53 PM

Mentor
P: 17,543




#7
Aug2814, 01:01 PM

P: 83

This does not require GRT, just Newton and Galilei.
No force is acting in the rest frame of the ball. In the rest frame of the elevator however a gravity force IS acting. 


#8
Aug2814, 02:02 PM

P: 4,233




#9
Aug2814, 05:49 PM

P: 83




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
A ball falls under gravity  Introductory Physics Homework  21  
Weight of ball/water/cylinder system as the ball falls  Introductory Physics Homework  2  
Determine the net force acting on a ball as it rolls down a ramp.  Introductory Physics Homework  3  
Ball falls from top of cliff; kinematics  Introductory Physics Homework  4  
What is the magnitude of the net force acting on the ball?  Introductory Physics Homework  6 