- #1
schwarzchildradius
How do you reconcile GWB's father's wise choice of withdrawing from Iraq with the son's incessant thirst for blood?
Bush SR made a mistake.schwarzchildradius said:How do you reconcile GWB's father's wise choice of withdrawing from Iraq with the son's incessant thirst for blood?
So just stealing.drag said:Greetings !
Under the circumstances coalition forces can't win this
fight. They should concentrate around the oil wells and
retreat from all population centers. In the open they will
be almost completely safe with their supperiority in heavy
weapons and armor and Iraqis will be less eager to attack
them.
The Muslims can do whatever they want in the meantime
and everybody gets what they want.
Live long and prosper.
GHWB strategic withdrawal refers to the strategic military plan developed and implemented by the administration of George H.W. Bush during his presidency in the late 1980s and early 1990s. It involved the gradual reduction and eventual withdrawal of American troops from the Cold War conflict zones, such as Europe and Korea, in order to save military resources and reduce tensions with the Soviet Union.
GHWB implemented this strategy as part of his foreign policy approach to prioritize diplomacy and reduce American military involvement in international conflicts. The end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union also played a significant role in this decision, as it signaled a shift in global power dynamics and a decrease in the need for a large American military presence.
The effects of GHWB strategic withdrawal were complex and varied. On one hand, it helped reduce tensions with the Soviet Union and led to the signing of several arms control treaties. It also saved military resources and allowed for a shift towards a more diplomatic approach to foreign relations. On the other hand, it also led to criticism and concerns about the potential power vacuum and instability in the regions where American troops were withdrawn.
Yes, GHWB strategic withdrawal had long-term consequences that are still being felt today. The reduction of American military presence in Europe and Korea led to a shift in global power dynamics and the rise of new regional powers. It also had an impact on the stability of certain regions and the ability of the US to intervene in conflicts. Additionally, some argue that the withdrawal may have contributed to the rise of global terrorism in the 1990s and early 2000s.
GHWB strategic withdrawal is often compared to other US military strategies, such as the Nixon Doctrine and the Obama administration's pivot to Asia. While all these strategies aimed to reduce American military involvement in certain regions and prioritize diplomacy, each had its own unique approach and goals. GHWB strategic withdrawal was specifically focused on reducing Cold War tensions and saving military resources, while other strategies had different motivations and objectives.