surface energy


by aaaa202
Tags: energy, surface
aaaa202
aaaa202 is offline
#1
Jan28-14, 09:48 AM
P: 995
Does atom at the surface of a crystal have more or less energy than those in the bulk? And how does this relate to their Gibbs free energy?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
How do liquid foams block sound?
When things get glassy, molecules go fractal
Chameleon crystals could enable active camouflage (w/ video)
Useful nucleus
Useful nucleus is offline
#2
Jan29-14, 05:03 PM
Useful nucleus's Avatar
P: 240
The notion of energy per atom in a solid is a bit ambiguous.
The surface atoms are under-coordinated (less number of bonds), thus it is expected that the average potential energy on the surface should be higher compared to the bulk.
I do not recall any general conclusion about the vibrational free energy of the surface or its stress-volume energy.
bcrowell
bcrowell is offline
#3
Jan29-14, 09:46 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
bcrowell's Avatar
P: 5,500
At atom at the surface has a higher electrical PE than an atom in the bulk. This is because the electric force on the atom is inward.

aaaa202
aaaa202 is offline
#4
Feb2-14, 07:26 PM
P: 995

surface energy


So is the surface energy simple the excess energy that the surface atoms have due to unsaturated Bonds?
Useful nucleus
Useful nucleus is offline
#5
Feb7-14, 03:45 AM
Useful nucleus's Avatar
P: 240
Quote Quote by aaaa202 View Post
So is the surface energy simple the excess energy that the surface atoms have due to unsaturated Bonds?
This is the "unrelaxed" surface energy.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
surface energy General Physics 2
Potential Energy Surface Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 0
Surface energy.. Introductory Physics Homework 2
Surface Energy of a Balloon Introductory Physics Homework 2
Surface Energy... Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics 2