Error Analysis: Solving 2a^2 + b^2 with Uncertainty (a=6.0+/-0.1, b=17.5+/-0.3)

In summary: I'll fix the other errors that have propagated from this one.In summary, when given that a=(6.0+/-0.1) and b=(17.5+/-0.3) and asked to find 2a^2+b^2, the possible values of 2a^2+b^2 lie within the interval of 356.46 to 391.26. This can also be approximated by taking the midpoint of the interval (373.86) and adding or subtracting the larger of the differences between the given values and the endpoints (19.79) to get an estimate of 373.86+/-19.79. Another way to approximate
  • #1
neoking77
31
0
given that a=(6.0+/-0.1) and b=(17.5+/-0.3)

what is 2a^2 + b^2

i'm having so much trouble with this
i think we first go (6.0+/-0.1)^2 then times it by 2, and add (17.5+/-0.3)^2...i tried this but couldn't get the right answer...what am i doing wrong?
...ANY help would be greatly appreciated...i feel if someone will help me with just this question i can figure out how to do the rest. thank you in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
whats the answer?
 
  • #3
neoking77 said:
i think we first go (6.0+/-0.1)^2 then times it by 2, and add (17.5+/-0.3)^2...i tried this but couldn't get the right answer...what am i doing wrong?

That seems like the right idea.

If you show us your arithmetic and tell us what the "right" answer is supposed to be, somebody can probably help you more.

I wonder if you wre supposed to use the approximate formula

(x +/- y)^2 = (x^2) +/- (2xy)

not the exact formula

(x +/- y)2 = (x^2+y^2) +/- (2xy)
 
  • #4
AlephZero said:
That seems like the right idea.

If you show us your arithmetic and tell us what the "right" answer is supposed to be, somebody can probably help you more.

I wonder if you wre supposed to use the approximate formula

(x +/- y)^2 = (x^2) +/- (2xy)

not the exact formula

(x +/- y)2 = (x^2+y^2) +/- (2xy)
when multiplying or adding quantities with small uncertainties, add uncertainties. i think.
 
  • #5
neoking77 said:
given that a=(6.0+/-0.1) and b=(17.5+/-0.3)

what is 2a^2 + b^2

i'm having so much trouble with this
i think we first go (6.0+/-0.1)^2 then times it by 2, and add (17.5+/-0.3)^2...i tried this but couldn't get the right answer...what am i doing wrong?
...ANY help would be greatly appreciated...i feel if someone will help me with just this question i can figure out how to do the rest. thank you in advance!

I'm not sure what you mean by (6.0+/-0.1)^2. I presume you mean that you make two calculations: The largest that 6.0+/- 0.1 can be is, of course, 6.1. 6.12= 37.21 and 2 times that is 74.42. The largest that 17.5+/-0.3 can be is 17.8. 17.82= 316.84. Since we are adding positive numbers (you have to be careful about that) the largest possible value of 2a2+ b2 is 391.26.

Similarly, the smallest possible value of 6.0+/-0.1 is 5.9. Using that value for a, 2a2= 2(5.9)2 is 69.62. The smallest possible value of 17.5+/-0.3 is 17.2. Its square is 295.84. The smallest possible value of 2a2+ b2 is the sum of those: 356.46.

That is, if a= 6.0+/-0.1 and b= 17.5+/-0.3, then 2a2+ b2 can lie any where between 356.46 and 391.26. You will notice that the value 2(62)+ 17.52= 378.25 is between those but not exactly in the middle: the midpoint of the interval is (391.26+ 356.46)/2= 373.86.

To write that in the form x+/- d, we can do either of two things:
(1)take the midpoint of the interval, 373.86 and, since 373.86- 356.46= 391.20-373.86= 17.4, the value is 373.86+/-17.4 or
(2)take the value given by 6.0 and 17.5, 376.25 and noting that 391.26- 376.25= 15.01 and 376.25-356.46= 19.79 (the interval is not symmetric about that value), use the larger of those, 19.79, to be sure we are inside the interval: 376.25+/-19.79.
The latter is typically easier to calculate but allows for a larger "error" than necessary.

We could also approximate as follows: if f= 2a2+ b2, then, differentiating, df= 4ada+ 2bdb. "df", the differential, is not exactly the "error" but if the error is small, they are close. Here, df= 4(6.0)(0.1)+ 2(17.5)(0.3)= 12.9 giving 376.25+/- 12.9 as the estimate.

There is an engineering "rule of thumb" that "When quantities add, the errors add. When quantities multiply, the relative errors add."
Specifically, d(a+ b)= da+ db so the "errors add"
d(ab)= bda+ adb and, dividing by ab, d(ab)/ab= da/a+ db/b. da/a and db/b are, of course, the "relative errors".
 
  • #6
HallsofIvy said:
Similarly, the smallest possible value of 6.0+/-0.1 is 5.9. Using that value for a, 2a2= 2(5.9)2 is 69.62. The smallest possible value of 17.5+/-0.3 is 17.2. Its square is 295.84. The smallest possible value of 2a2+ b2 is the sum of those: 356.46.

It's 365.46; you reversed the digits. I'll choose to let neoking77 fix any errors that have propagated with that one -- it's his problem, after all.
 
  • #7
HallsofIvy; (2)take the value given by 6.0 and 17.5 said:
Exact value with 6 and 17.5 is 378.25
 

1. What is error analysis and why is it important in scientific research?

Error analysis is the process of examining and identifying the sources of error in a scientific experiment or study. It is important because it allows researchers to identify and eliminate or minimize potential errors, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of their data and conclusions.

2. How do you conduct error analysis?

Error analysis involves reviewing all aspects of the experimental design, data collection, and analysis to identify any potential sources of error. This can include examining equipment, procedures, and data for accuracy and consistency, as well as considering external factors that may have influenced the results.

3. How do you determine the significance of errors in a study?

The significance of errors in a study can be determined by considering their potential impact on the results. This can include evaluating the magnitude of the error, as well as its effect on the overall conclusions of the study. Researchers may also use statistical analysis to determine the significance of errors.

4. How can error analysis be used to improve future studies?

By identifying and understanding the sources of error in a study, researchers can make adjustments and improvements to their methods in future studies. This can lead to more accurate and reliable results, and ultimately, a better understanding of the topic being studied.

5. Can errors ever be completely eliminated in scientific research?

While researchers can take steps to minimize errors, it is almost impossible to completely eliminate them. This is because there are often external factors that cannot be controlled, and there is always a margin of error in any measurement or observation. However, by conducting thorough error analysis and making necessary adjustments, researchers can reduce the impact of errors on their results.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
982
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
699
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
253
Back
Top