- #1
- 3,503
- 1,617
I've certainly hear and read tons of stuff that is not only less than top notch science, but also seems to answer the wrong questions.
What I am specifically interested in are scientific cases presented - not for how much damage we are experiencing or will experience - but what good it would do to, for example, reduce carbon emissions. Clearly there are problems with making absolute forecasts, but comparative ones would do as well.
For example, is there any research that would project how much less sea level rise there would be in probabilistic terms decade by decade over the next century or two if we reduce CO2 emissions by 50%?
What I am specifically interested in are scientific cases presented - not for how much damage we are experiencing or will experience - but what good it would do to, for example, reduce carbon emissions. Clearly there are problems with making absolute forecasts, but comparative ones would do as well.
For example, is there any research that would project how much less sea level rise there would be in probabilistic terms decade by decade over the next century or two if we reduce CO2 emissions by 50%?