- #1
- 2,704
- 19
I've been asked to review a paper for a physics journal, and this is my first experience with being a reviewer.
Does anyone have any advice on being a good reviewer? Types of things to focus on, etc.?
Should I focus my critiques around the science alone, or is it ok to point out that the paper is poorly written (to the point that it obscures the science and impedes understanding.)
Does anyone have any advice on being a good reviewer? Types of things to focus on, etc.?
Should I focus my critiques around the science alone, or is it ok to point out that the paper is poorly written (to the point that it obscures the science and impedes understanding.)