- #1
Andre
- 4,311
- 74
is here:
http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html
I spotted the expected errors:
http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/AR4WG1_TS.pdf
Not! See:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=162192
Note that the "temperature graph" refutes any form of strong positive feedback, be it caused by CO2 or by any other mechanism.
A second problem is the incredible thrust in isotopes being reliable paleothermometers, which is -repeating again- demonstratably not so.
http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html
I spotted the expected errors:
http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/AR4WG1_TS.pdf
The Milankovitch, or ‘orbital’ theory of the ice ages is now well developed. Ice ages are generally triggered by minima in high-latitude NH summer insolation, enabling winter snowfall to persist through the year and therefore accumulate to build NH glacial ice sheets. Similarly, times with especially intense high-latitude NH summer insolation, determined by orbital changes, are thought to trigger rapid deglaciations, associated climate change and sea level rise. These orbital forcings determine the pacing of climatic changes, while the large responses appear to be determined by strong feedback processes that amplify the orbital forcing. Over multi-millennial time scales, orbital forcing also exerts a major influence on key climate systems such as the Earth’s major monsoons, global ocean circulation and the greenhouse gas content of the atmosphere. {6.4}
Not! See:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=162192
Note that the "temperature graph" refutes any form of strong positive feedback, be it caused by CO2 or by any other mechanism.
A second problem is the incredible thrust in isotopes being reliable paleothermometers, which is -repeating again- demonstratably not so.
Last edited by a moderator: