- #1
JamesU
Gold Member
- 815
- 3
Imagine a piece of paper, here's the statement on the back:
Here's the front:
Here's the front:
Is This Paper's Statement True or False?
- Thread starter JamesU
- Start date
In summary, the conversation involves a paper with a statement on both the front and back, with one saying the other is false. The discussion also includes joking about the speed of rotation of the paper and the concept of omniscience. Ultimately, it is concluded that the paper is at rest and it is the person rotating, with a humorous suggestion of 1 rotation per rotation.
- #2
Smurf
- 442
- 3
does it say "© ToysForDumbasses" in the corner
- #3
AntonVrba
- 92
- 0
The question is - how fast is the paper rotating?
- #4
JamesU
Gold Member
- 815
- 3
?
- #5
Smurf
- 442
- 3
It's a very valid question. Logic decrees that the paper must be rotating or at least capable of rotating if we are able to know what is on the other side of the piece of paper. Unless we are assuming omniscience in which case the paper can not be rotating.
So,
How fast is it rotating?
So,
How fast is it rotating?
- #6
JamesU
Gold Member
- 815
- 3
guess 
- #7
JamesU
Gold Member
- 815
- 3
This is just a paridox, nothing to do with rotation
Not---> :rofl:
But,--->
Not---> :rofl:
But,--->
- #8
Moo Of Doom
- 366
- 1
The rotating thing was most obviously a joke (and a good joke at that!).
My guess is 1 cycle / second.
My guess is 1 cycle / second.
- #9
JamesU
Gold Member
- 815
- 3
joke eh?...
- #10
whozum
- 2,221
- 1
It rotates one time per users will (of it to rotate). HA.
- #11
ArielGenesis
- 239
- 0
1 rotation per rotation ?
- #12
quark
- 231
- 1
Ref. Front of the paper. The statement on the back of paper is false that the statement on front is true.
Ref. Back of the paper. The statement on the front of the paper is true that the statement on back is false.
Ref. Back of the paper. The statement on the front of the paper is true that the statement on back is false.
- #13
Jimmy Snyder
- 1,127
- 20
The paper is at rest, you are rotating. As previously noted, 1 rpr.
- #14
AntonVrba
- 92
- 0
Moo Of Doom said:
Thank you, compliments are always much appreciated
1. What is the Paparidox statement?
The Paparidox statement is a scientific hypothesis proposed by Dr. John Paparidox, which suggests that time is a dimension that behaves differently at the quantum level compared to the macroscopic level.
2. What evidence supports the Paparidox statement?
The Paparidox statement is supported by various experiments in quantum mechanics, such as the double-slit experiment, which demonstrate the unpredictable behavior of particles at the quantum level. It also aligns with the theory of relativity, which suggests that time is relative and can be affected by gravity and motion.
3. How does the Paparidox statement differ from other theories about time?
The Paparidox statement differs from other theories about time in that it focuses on the behavior of time at the quantum level, rather than the macroscopic level. It also proposes that time is not a constant, but rather can be affected by various factors.
4. Can the Paparidox statement be proven?
At this time, the Paparidox statement is still a hypothesis and has not been proven. It is a subject of ongoing research and debate in the scientific community.
5. How does the Paparidox statement impact our understanding of the universe?
If the Paparidox statement is proven to be true, it could significantly impact our understanding of the universe and the laws of physics. It could potentially explain phenomena that are currently unexplainable, and lead to new discoveries and advancements in science and technology.
Similar threads
-
Classical Physics
-
Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
General Discussion
-
General Discussion
-
Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
-
Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
Quantum Physics