Molecules back to singular atoms.

In summary, the molecules in living organisms may separate quicker if they are moved more vigorously during their lifetime, leading to a shorter lifespan. However, this is not always the case as some animals with slower movement can have longer lifespans than those with faster movement. The maximum lifespan of an animal is primarily determined by its genetics and the rate of DNA repair in its cells. Evolution tends towards shorter lifespans as the main goal is to pass on genes to the next generation. The idea that molecules spontaneously break up is not supported by scientific evidence.
  • #1
Drbazz
9
0
Do the atoms in molecules separate quicker if they are moved more vigourously in their lifetime and therefoe cause death of the living organism they makes up sooner? For example: A giant tortoise is slower than a cheatah during its life and lives longer. A tree is slower than a tortoise and lives longer. During a hydrogen Bomb the molecules are separated allmost instantly. Does this make any semse to anyone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Drbazz said:
Do the atoms in molecules separate quicker if they are moved more vigourously in their lifetime and therefoe cause death of the living organism they makes up sooner? For example: A giant tortoise is slower than a cheatah during its life and lives longer. A tree is slower than a tortoise and lives longer. During a hydrogen Bomb the molecules are separated allmost instantly. Does this make any semse to anyone?

No.

How do you equate something moving slower (a tortoise) has having "slower" molecular motion? Do you think such movement actually provides THAT significant speed to what is already present with molecular vibration?

Zz.
 
  • #3
ZapperZ said:
No.

How do you equate something moving slower (a tortoise) has having "slower" molecular motion? Do you think such movement actually provides THAT significant speed to what is already present with molecular vibration?

Zz.

So do molecules allways vibrate at the same speed no matter what forces are put against them? Sorry I'm no expert on this so not completely sure on molecular vibrations. It just confuses me how a animals which have very similar molecular make-up live for different times. Why if the molecules are the same do they change back to atoms at different speeds? And these speeds are not random. Animals have average ages to living too.
 
  • #4
Drbazz said:
So do molecules allways vibrate at the same speed no matter what forces are put against them? Sorry I'm no expert on this so not completely sure on molecular vibrations. It just confuses me how a animals which have very similar molecular make-up live for different times. Why if the molecules are the same do they change back to atoms at different speeds? And these speeds are not random. Animals have average ages to living too.

This is more of a question for biologist then a physics question, because the speed that we move normally is MINISCULE when compared to how fast molecules, atoms, and other particles move in material.

Biology is a complex field. I think you are missing a lot of other factors beyond just "molecule speed" when considering lifespan.

Zz.
 
  • #5
ZapperZ said:
This is more of a question for biologist then a physics question, because the speed that we move normally is MINISCULE when compared to how fast molecules, atoms, and other particles move in material.

Biology is a complex field. I think you are missing a lot of other factors beyond just "molecule speed" when considering lifespan.

Zz.

Well is it known why molecules separate back to atoms, do all water molecules last the same amount of time and is there anyway to predict when certain molecules will break up?
 
  • #6
Drbazz said:
Well is it known why molecules separate back to atoms

It is?

do all water molecules last the same amount of time and is there anyway to predict when certain molecules will break up?

I don't know. You were the one who claim they somehow spontaneously break up. So it is you who needs to provide the reference on where you got the idea from.

Zz.
 
  • #7
Drbazz said:
Do the atoms in molecules separate quicker if they are moved more vigourously in their lifetime and therefoe cause death of the living organism they makes up sooner? For example: A giant tortoise is slower than a cheatah during its life and lives longer. A tree is slower than a tortoise and lives longer.

If slow speed determines longevity, then I guess Windows Vista will be around forever!

OK, back to science now :)

A gaint tortoise may move slow and have a long lifespan, but a giant bowhead whale moves faster than the tortoise and has been recorded as having a lifespan longer than that of the Galápagos tortoise! http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/wildfacts/factfiles/51.shtml" :

Bowhead whales are believed to be the longest-lived animals on Earth ... and one individual was estimated to be 211 years old.​

Look at the *really* slow moving Pale-throated three-toed sloth with its http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/wildfacts/factfiles/608.shtml" also.

So, there are definitely lots of animals out there that don't fit into your "slower movement = longer lifespan" model. In fact, locomotion speed may not even be correlated with lifespan, as you can see from my example.

Maximum lifespan of an animal, on the other hand, is probably very closely tied to its genetics, especially with http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9055244" :

Thus the activity with which nuclear and mitochondrial DNA is repaired in somatic cells is likely to be an crucial determinant of maximal lifespan (MLS)​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
For mammals life span is about inversely proportional to heart rate - so all animals have roughly the same number of heartbeats!

Ultimately it's a question of thermodynamics, for small animals you lose heat quicjly and must have a high metabolism to keep going. This means you can grow a small body quickly and reach reporduction age fast. For large animals a slow metabolism takes time to grow a body to adult hood and hence a longer lifespan.

Remember evolution in general tends toward SHORTER lives, your genes want to get the next generation of genes out there as fast as possible - they have no interest in prolonging your life after you finished breeding.
 
  • #9
ZapperZ said:
It is?



I don't know. You were the one who claim they somehow spontaneously break up. So it is you who needs to provide the reference on where you got the idea from.

Zz.

I read it in a book by Bill Bryson. Its obvious your molecules break up when you die and change to something else as your body is no longer there.
 
  • #10
Drbazz said:
Its obvious your molecules break up when you die and change to something else as your body is no longer there.
A slight misunderstanding, generally molecules are stable. It takes energy to break a molcule apart but gives off energy to create one.

Often for a large molecule the energy you need to break it up is less than the energy you will get by forming many new smaller molecules. This is true of you burning diesel into water and CO2 in a truck engine and for large molecules in your body breaking up.

This is a constant process and you are using the energy given off when these burn to heat your body you also take in new large molecules that have been helpfully made for you by plants. They use the Suns's energy to break up the smaller molecules and put them together into large ones.
 
  • #11
Drbazz said:
I read it in a book by Bill Bryson. Its obvious your molecules break up when you die and change to something else as your body is no longer there.

You have a severe misunderstanding of "tissue/cellular breakdown" versus molecular break up. Try to break up H and O out of water if you can and see what is needed.

Also, when we require a citation in here, you need to make a FULL citation. This means name of author, title of the book, edition number, publisher, year, etc. This is how it is often required in most scientific discussion, and we try to have a higher standard than most open forums.

Zz.
 

1. What is the process of molecules breaking down into singular atoms?

The process of molecules breaking down into singular atoms is called dissociation. This occurs when the bonds between atoms in a molecule are broken, resulting in the formation of individual atoms.

2. What causes molecules to break down into singular atoms?

Molecules can break down into singular atoms due to various factors such as high temperatures, chemical reactions, or exposure to radiation. These processes can provide enough energy to break the bonds between atoms.

3. Can all molecules be broken down into singular atoms?

No, not all molecules can be broken down into singular atoms. Some molecules, such as noble gases, are made up of single atoms and do not have any bonds that can be broken. Other molecules have strong bonds that require a lot of energy to break down.

4. What happens to the atoms after a molecule breaks down?

After a molecule breaks down into singular atoms, the atoms can form new bonds with other atoms to create new molecules. They can also exist as free atoms, which can combine with other atoms to form compounds or participate in chemical reactions.

5. Why is it important to understand the process of molecules breaking down into singular atoms?

Understanding the process of molecules breaking down into singular atoms is important in many fields of science, such as chemistry, biology, and physics. It helps to explain the behavior of substances and how they interact with each other. It also allows scientists to manipulate and create new materials, compounds, and chemical reactions for various purposes.

Similar threads

  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
0
Views
734
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top