Connections of degenerate metrics

  • Thread starter haushofer
  • Start date
In summary, the question is whether the transformation properties of a connection change when considering connections derived from degenerate metrics. There are two perspectives - one considering the usual GR-analysis and the other taking into account the specific conditions in Newton-Cartan. The answer depends on the chosen metrical structure, and in some cases, the freedom in the connection can be interpreted as a potential.
  • #1
haushofer
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,952
1,497
I have a question about connections derived from degenerate metrics, like in Newton-Cartan.

The question is simply: can the transformation properties of the connection change if one considers connections derived from metrics which are degenerate?

One one hand, I would say that one can follow the usual GR-analysis, check how covariant derivatives of general vectors/covectors must transform and conclude how the connection must transform (with a inhomogeneous term).

On the other hand, in Newton-Cartan one has the metric conditions

[tex]
\nabla_{\mu}\tau_{\nu} = 0, \ \ \ \ \nabla_{\rho}h^{\mu\nu}=0
[/tex]

where [itex]h^{\mu\nu}\tau_{\nu}=0[/itex]; h plays the role of spatial metric, and tau the role of temporal metric.

So, do the transformation properties of the connection depend on the metrical structure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
haushofer said:
I have a question about connections derived from degenerate metrics, like in Newton-Cartan.

So, do the transformation properties of the connection depend on the metrical structure?

I would rather say: connection is a connection and it can be considered independently of the metric. Then, if you have a metric, degenerate or not, you may impose conditions on your general connection and solve these conditions as much as you can - given the circumstances. If your metric is non-degenerate and if you impose zero-torsion, then your metric determines the connection uniquely. Otherwise you can have some freedom. Sometimes this freedom can be eliminated by requiring that your connection is smooth across some lower dimensional submanifold where your metric degenerates. If you would quote some particular page in some particular paper, then I could be more specific.

In Newton-Cartan you will have a certain freedom in your connection. With the right setting you can interpret this freedom as some kind of a (electromagnetic?) potential.
 
Last edited:

1. What are degenerate metrics?

Degenerate metrics are mathematical measures of distance or space that do not follow the typical rules of non-degenerate metrics. In other words, they may not be symmetric, positive-definite, or satisfy the triangle inequality.

2. How are degenerate metrics used in scientific research?

Degenerate metrics are often used in fields such as physics, engineering, and computer science to model and analyze complex systems and phenomena. They can also be used to study non-Euclidean geometries and curved spaces.

3. What are some examples of degenerate metrics?

Some examples of degenerate metrics include Minkowski spacetime, which is used in special relativity, and the Hamming distance, which measures the number of different characters between two strings. Other examples can be found in graph theory, statistics, and optimization.

4. How do degenerate metrics differ from non-degenerate metrics?

While non-degenerate metrics follow the traditional rules of distance and space, degenerate metrics do not. This means that they may not always accurately represent the physical distance between two points or the shape of a space. Additionally, degenerate metrics may have multiple solutions or no solutions at all.

5. What are the implications of using degenerate metrics in scientific analysis?

The use of degenerate metrics can lead to unique and sometimes unexpected results. They can provide insights into complex systems that cannot be captured by non-degenerate metrics. However, caution must be taken when interpreting results from degenerate metrics, as they may not always reflect the true nature of the system being studied.

Similar threads

  • Differential Geometry
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
62
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
187
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top