- #1
imiyakawa
- 262
- 1
I've been doing a lot of reading on Psi-phenomena experiments as of late, and it appears as though an overwhelming number of experiments are producing statistically compelling positive results (although, these are small results that are produced over long period of time). I find this amazing as if proven this will be a discovery that will change almost all of science. Obviously, I can't wait to see what the next 30 years of attempted replication will bring.
Discuss:
What more is needed for conclusive proof.
If this phenomenon is conclusively proven, what are the subsequent consequences.
Some sources:
- http://dbem.ws/online_pubs.html (Scroll down to "Psi phenomena (ESP)" for his papers)
- http://noosphere.princeton.edu/ (The most compelling, the most bulletproof to skeptical criticisms, click on "main results" up the top left)
- http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/ (Go to publications and read the papers)
Criticism (actually by Apeiron, PF member):
http://dichotomistic.com/mind_readings_psi%20pear%20lab.html
EDIT: Some graphs to get you guys reading:
(PEAR proposition 1995 paper)
(Princeton PEAR 1992 paper on human/machine interaction)
(noosphere.princeton.edu experiment)
Discuss:
What more is needed for conclusive proof.
If this phenomenon is conclusively proven, what are the subsequent consequences.
Some sources:
- http://dbem.ws/online_pubs.html (Scroll down to "Psi phenomena (ESP)" for his papers)
- http://noosphere.princeton.edu/ (The most compelling, the most bulletproof to skeptical criticisms, click on "main results" up the top left)
- http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/ (Go to publications and read the papers)
Criticism (actually by Apeiron, PF member):
http://dichotomistic.com/mind_readings_psi%20pear%20lab.html
EDIT: Some graphs to get you guys reading:
(PEAR proposition 1995 paper)
(Princeton PEAR 1992 paper on human/machine interaction)
(noosphere.princeton.edu experiment)
Last edited: