USAF 'discovered' pulsars long before Bell Burnell

In summary, the USAF's discovery of pulsars before Bell Burnell challenges the commonly accepted narrative and raises questions about recognition of female scientists in astronomy. The USAF discovered pulsars using a radio telescope in 1965, but it was not initially recognized due to the classified nature of the data. Evidence such as witness testimonies and data from the telescope support the USAF's claim of discovering pulsars first. It is important to acknowledge the USAF's contribution in order to provide a more complete and accurate history of the discovery and recognize the contributions of all individuals involved.
  • #1
neutrino
2,094
2
...but they just didn't call it such. :rolleyes:

Interesting story: http://scienceblogs.com/catdynamics/2007/08/schisler.php
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
So, is it technically possible for the USAF to have won a nobel prize :tongue:?
 
  • #3
siddharth said:
So, is it technically possible for the USAF to have won a nobel prize :tongue:?

Why should it have been possible for the USAF when it wasn't possible for Bell Burnell?
 

What is the significance of the USAF's discovery of pulsars before Bell Burnell?

The discovery of pulsars by the USAF before Bell Burnell is significant because it challenges the commonly accepted narrative that Jocelyn Bell Burnell was the sole discoverer of pulsars. It also raises questions about the recognition and credit given to female scientists in the field of astronomy.

How did the USAF discover pulsars?

The USAF discovered pulsars using a radio telescope at the Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratory in 1965. The telescope was used to study radio waves from the sun, but unexpectedly detected regular pulses of radio waves coming from a different source.

Why was the USAF's discovery not initially recognized?

The USAF's discovery of pulsars was not initially recognized because it was not published in a scientific journal. The data was classified and used for military purposes, so it was not shared with the scientific community.

What evidence supports the USAF's claim of discovering pulsars first?

There are several pieces of evidence that support the USAF's claim of discovering pulsars before Bell Burnell. This includes the witness testimonies of the scientists involved in the discovery, as well as data and records from the radio telescope used.

Why is it important to acknowledge the USAF's contribution to the discovery of pulsars?

It is important to acknowledge the USAF's contribution to the discovery of pulsars because it provides a more complete and accurate history of the scientific breakthrough. It also highlights the contributions of military-funded research to scientific advancements. Additionally, recognizing the USAF's involvement helps to give credit to all individuals involved in the discovery, not just one person.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
571
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
28
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
75
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
18
Views
2K
Back
Top