- #1
joeyar
- 53
- 0
2, 8, 62, 622, 7772, ...
jimmysnyder said:I get
117644
n^(n-1) - n + 2
eom
And quick too,jimmysnyder said:I get
117644
n^(n-1) - n + 2
eom
The fact that 8, 62, and 622 are all close to small powers of small integers, and off by 1, 2, and 3 was the key for me.RandallB said:And quick too,
did you use any "special logic” to guide your judgment to a solution
or was it random attempts and personal "feel".
That's quite a coincidence. It turns out that 11111 is also the next number in the sequence:Borek said:11111. These are roots of the following polynomial:
[tex]f(x) = x^6-19577x^5+99504914x^4-60788218692x^3+3929719423336x^2-34258540436320x+53282917476608[/tex]
The first step in determining the next number in a sequence is to identify the pattern. This could be a simple arithmetic progression, where each number increases or decreases by a fixed amount, or it could be a more complex pattern involving multiplication, division, or other operations.
If there are missing numbers in the sequence, it could indicate a more complex pattern or a mistake in the sequence itself. It's important to check for missing numbers and determine if they fit into the pattern or not.
Some sequences have a clear pattern and can be extended infinitely, while others may have a limited number of terms before the pattern breaks down. It's important to analyze the sequence and determine if it can be extended indefinitely or not.
Outliers are numbers that do not fit the established pattern of the sequence. It's important to identify and analyze outliers to determine if they are significant and if they should be included in determining the next number in the sequence.
Predicting the next number in a sequence is not an exact science and there is always a margin of error. It's important to be aware of this and to consider the complexity of the pattern and the presence of outliers when determining the confidence level of the predicted next number.