How Do You Give a Rigorous Proof for Fraction Multiplication?

In summary, a rigorous proof of the equality \frac{\frac{a}{b}}{\frac{c}{d}} = \frac{a}{b}.\frac{d}{c} was given using the definition of division, the theorem (1/x).(1/y) = 1/xy, the axiom 1.x = x, the fact x.(1/x) = 1, and the associative law.
  • #1
poutsos.A
102
1
Give a rigorous proof using the appropriate axioms and the definition ,[tex]\frac{a}{b}=a\frac{1}{b}[/tex] of the following:

[tex]\frac{a}{b}*\frac{c}{d}=\frac{ac}{bd}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{a}{b}:\frac{c}{d} =\frac{ad}{bc}[/tex]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
According to the forum guidelines, you have to show what you've tried and explain what you don't understand before receiving help.
 
  • #3
[tex]\frac{a}{b}*\frac{c}{d}= a\frac{1}{b}*c\frac{1}{d}=ac*\frac{1}{bd}=\frac{ac}{bd}[/tex]

That is how far i can go.But then this is not a rigorous proof, is there??
 
  • #4
poutsos.A said:
[tex]\frac{a}{b}*\frac{c}{d}= a\frac{1}{b}*c\frac{1}{d}=ac*\frac{1}{bd}=\frac{ac}{bd}[/tex]

That is how far i can go.But then this is not a rigorous proof, is there??

You have not stated which axioms/theorems you used in the second equality.
 
  • #5
commutativity and associativity
 
  • #6
poutsos.A said:
commutativity and associativity

Right. How did you prove the equality:(1/b)(1/d) = 1/(bd) ?
 
  • #7
The whole point of these exercices is to justify each of your steps with the proper axioms. As Slider142 said, now all that's remains to be justified is (1/b)(1/d) = 1/(bd).

But you should use more parenthesis, to highlight the use of associativity. That is, instead of

[tex]
\frac{a}{b}*\frac{c}{d}= a\frac{1}{b}*c\frac{1}{d}=ac*\frac{1}{bd}=\frac{ac }{bd}[/tex]

better is

[tex]\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)\left(\frac{c}{d}\right)=\left(a\frac{1}{b}\right)\left(c\frac{1}{d}\right)=\left(\left(a\frac{1}{b}\right)c\right)\frac{1}{d}=\left(a\left(\frac{1}{b}c\right)\right)\frac{1}{d}=\left(a\left(c\frac{1}{b}\right)\right)\frac{1}{d}=\left(\left(ac\right)\frac{1}{b}\right)\frac{1}{d}=(ac)\left(\frac{1}{b}\frac{1}{d}\right)=(ac)\left\frac{1}{bd}=\frac{ac}{bd}[/tex]

and the justifications are: by definition, by associativity, by associativity, by commutativity, by associativity, by associativity, by <insert justification why (1/b)(1/d) = 1/(bd)>, by definition.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
slider142 said:
Right. How did you prove the equality:(1/b)(1/d) = 1/(bd) ?


The only proof i can thing of ,is the following:

[tex]\frac{1}{b}\frac{1}{d} = \frac{1}{bd}\Longleftrightarrow (bd)\frac{1}{b}\frac{1}{d} = (bd)\frac{1}{bd}\Longleftrightarrow d(b\frac{1}{b})\frac{1}{d} = 1\Longleftrightarrow d\frac{1}{d} = 1[/tex].

But then again this is not a rigorous proof ,is there??
 
  • #9
poutsos.A said:
The only proof i can thing of ,is the following:

[tex]\frac{1}{b}\frac{1}{d} = \frac{1}{bd}\Longleftrightarrow (bd)\frac{1}{b}\frac{1}{d} = (bd)\frac{1}{bd}\Longleftrightarrow d(b\frac{1}{b})\frac{1}{d} = 1\Longleftrightarrow d\frac{1}{d} = 1[/tex].

But then again this is not a rigorous proof ,is there??

That's a perfectly rigorous proof, assuming your definition of 1/(bd) is as the multiplicative inverse of bd. This completes the rigor of your proof.
 
  • #10
Could the following proof of :

[tex]\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{\frac{c}{d}} = \frac{a}{b}.\frac{d}{c}[/tex], be consider as a rigorous proof??


[tex]\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{\frac{c}{d}} = \frac{a}{b}.\frac{1}{\frac{c}{d}}[/tex] =............by definition of division x/y = x.(1/y) where we put x = a/b and y= c/d



= [tex]\frac{a}{b}.\frac{1}{c.\frac{1}{d}}[/tex] =..........by the definition of the division again where we put x=c and y= d



= [tex]\frac{a}{b}\frac{1}{c}.\frac{1}{\frac{1}{d}}[/tex] =............by the use of the theorem (1/x).(1/y) = 1/xy where we put x=c and y= 1/d



= [tex]\frac{a}{b}.\frac{1}{c}.(1.\frac{1}{\frac{1}{d}})[/tex] =...........by the use of the axiom 1.x = x where we put [tex] x=\frac{1}{\frac{1}{d}}[/tex]



= [tex]\frac{a}{b}.\frac{1}{c}.[(d.\frac{1}{d}).\frac{1}{\frac{1}{d}}][/tex] =............by the fact x.(1/x) = 1 where we put x=d



= [tex]\frac{a}{b}.\frac{1}{c}.[d.(\frac{1}{d}.\frac{1}{\frac{1}{d}})][/tex] = ..........by the associative law



=[tex]\frac{a}{b}.\frac{1}{c}.(d.1)[/tex] = ..............again by the fact x.(1/x) = 1 where we put x= 1/d




= [tex]\frac{a}{b}\frac{1}{c}.d [/tex] = ..............again by the axiom 1.x =x






= [tex]\frac{a}{b}\frac{c}{d}[/tex] = ...............again by the use of the definition x/y = x.(1/y) where we put x=d and y = c
 

1. What is a rigorous proof?

A rigorous proof is a logical and systematic process used to demonstrate the truth or validity of a statement or theorem. It involves using sound mathematical principles and reasoning to arrive at a conclusion that is indisputable and holds true under any circumstances.

2. Why is it important to have a rigorous proof?

Having a rigorous proof is important because it ensures that the conclusions we draw are based on solid evidence and reasoning, rather than assumptions or guesswork. It allows us to build upon previous knowledge and discoveries with confidence, and helps us avoid mistakes and errors in our thinking.

3. What are the key components of a rigorous proof?

The key components of a rigorous proof include a clear statement of what is being proved, a logical progression of steps or arguments, and the use of accepted mathematical principles and rules. It should also be written in a clear and concise manner, with all assumptions and definitions clearly stated.

4. How do you know when a proof is rigorous enough?

A proof is considered rigorous enough when it meets the standards of the mathematical community and is deemed valid by experts in the field. This can involve peer review and scrutiny from other mathematicians, as well as a thorough examination of the reasoning and evidence presented in the proof.

5. Can a proof ever be considered 100% certain?

While a rigorous proof may be considered highly reliable and accepted as true by the mathematical community, it can never be considered 100% certain. This is because there is always a possibility for new evidence or insights to emerge that may challenge or disprove the proof. However, a proof that meets the standards of rigor and has been thoroughly examined can be considered highly probable and reliable.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
394
Replies
1
Views
630
Replies
1
Views
742
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
412
Back
Top