- #1
Loren Booda
- 3,125
- 4
Could there exist entities that either obey only quantum mechanics or obey only general relativity - not as an approximation but as an absolute rule?
Loren Booda said:Gonzolo,
Perhaps there is a correspondent limit to observation at which the quantum nature of matter ceases. This might be the observable universe horizon, for instance. Likewise, the Planck length might demarcate a lower bound for the relativistic nature of space.
I suspect that HallsofIvy is right (as far as one can show), but in an infinite universe there can be an infinity of physical systems. The question is where do our familiar rules stop and how can we extend measurement beyond them?
Objects without quantum nature are those that do not exhibit any quantum properties, such as superposition or entanglement. These objects follow classical laws of physics and can be accurately described by classical mechanics.
Yes, objects without quantum nature can exist in the macroscopic world. Examples of such objects include everyday objects like a pencil, a table, or a car. These objects are too large and complex to exhibit any quantum properties.
The implications of objects without quantum nature are that they follow deterministic laws of physics and can be predicted with certainty. This is in contrast to quantum objects, which can only be described probabilistically.
Yes, there are many real-life applications of objects without quantum nature. For example, classical mechanics is used in engineering to design structures and machines, in medicine to understand the human body, and in astronomy to study celestial objects.
Objects without quantum nature follow classical laws of physics and do not exhibit any quantum properties, while objects with quantum nature follow quantum laws and can exhibit properties like superposition and entanglement. Additionally, classical objects can be described deterministically, while quantum objects can only be described probabilistically.