- #1
kamelot
- 5
- 0
I'm currently working on my bachelors in engineering physics and mathematics. I plan on getting a doctorate in particle physics but decided to get a masters in something engineering related that won't take me too far off the path physics. That way, I can make sure I get employed after I graduate as I wait for an opening as a Physics professor in Oklahoma.
quick questions:
1. Is a masters in engineering physics highly employable?
2. If it is highly employable, is it also highly employable in the research sector?
3. Is engineering physics still highly employable if you emphasize in particle physics?
4. If it is not highly employable while emphasizing in particle physics, then emphasizing in what area of physics makes it highly employable?
5. If a masters in engineering physics is not highly employable, then a masters in what field of engineering is highly employable that doesn't go too far off the path of something physics based (if any >.<)?
quick questions:
1. Is a masters in engineering physics highly employable?
2. If it is highly employable, is it also highly employable in the research sector?
3. Is engineering physics still highly employable if you emphasize in particle physics?
4. If it is not highly employable while emphasizing in particle physics, then emphasizing in what area of physics makes it highly employable?
5. If a masters in engineering physics is not highly employable, then a masters in what field of engineering is highly employable that doesn't go too far off the path of something physics based (if any >.<)?