Bush Ad Is Troubling Indeed

  • News
  • Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses a recent attack ad released by President Bush on John Kerry's tax plans. The ad has been criticized for recycling false claims and only focusing on part of Kerry's tax plan. Some have pointed out that if we apply Bush's standards to his own policies, he has proposed or signed for "higher taxes" 63 times in his presidency. However, the conversation also acknowledges that both candidates have voted for tax increases, with Bush having a slightly higher percentage. The conversation also mentions the impact of tax cuts on state taxes and the role of deceitful advertising in politics.
  • #1
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
8,142
1,756
Bush Ad Is "Troubling" Indeed

The President's ad recycles bogus claims, then tells only part of the story about Kerry's position on tax breaks for couples and children.

Bush released yet another attack on Kerry April 1, an ad appropriately named "troubling." The Bush ad recycles a couple of bogus claims we've de-bunked before -- a misleading claim that Kerry voted for "higher taxes" 350 times and a claim that "Kerry's plan will raise taxes by at least $900 billion." We pointed out previously that the 350-vote figure is so off base that it actually counts some Kerry votes for tax cuts as votes for "higher taxes." And as we said earlier , the only tax "plan" Kerry has proposed is to repeal Bush's tax cuts for those making $200,000 a year or more, while giving some additional tax breaks to those further down the income scale.

...I’m George W. Bush and I approve this message.

http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=167
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It seems that if we apply Bush's standards to his own policies that he proposed or signed "higher taxes" 63 times in his presidency. That's about 20 times a year, compared to 17.5 for Kerry (350/20). Is Bush for higher taxes? Of course not. He is, however, in favor of deceitful advertising.

Njorl
 
  • #3
Njorl said:
That's about 20 times a year, compared to 17.5 for Kerry...
Njorl

Seems to me Kerys only for voting tax increases 12.5% less then GW.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Is Bush for higher taxes? Of course not. He is, however, in favor of deceitful advertising.
He's certainly for higher taxes, why do you think tuition & state taxes have gone up sharply? The fed cut funding for the states, forcing them to cut their programs or raise fees & taxes. That's the result of "tax cuts" -- higher state taxes.
 

1. What is the "Bush Ad Is Troubling Indeed" campaign about?

The "Bush Ad Is Troubling Indeed" campaign is a scientific study and analysis of a political advertisement featuring former US President George W. Bush. The campaign aims to examine the various elements of the ad and its potential impact on viewers.

2. Who is conducting the "Bush Ad Is Troubling Indeed" campaign?

The campaign is being conducted by a team of researchers and scientists from various fields, including psychology, communication, and political science. Their expertise and knowledge allow for a comprehensive and unbiased analysis of the ad.

3. Why is the "Bush Ad Is Troubling Indeed" campaign important?

The campaign is important because it sheds light on the influence and effectiveness of political advertisements. By examining the ad through a scientific lens, we can gain a better understanding of how these ads can shape public opinion and potentially impact elections.

4. What kind of data is being collected in the "Bush Ad Is Troubling Indeed" campaign?

The campaign collects both qualitative and quantitative data. This includes analyzing the visual and auditory elements of the ad, as well as conducting surveys and experiments to measure the emotional and cognitive responses of viewers.

5. What are the potential implications of the findings from the "Bush Ad Is Troubling Indeed" campaign?

The findings from the campaign can have important implications for the political landscape. It can inform voters on how to critically evaluate political ads and make informed decisions, and it can also provide insights for politicians and their teams on how to create more effective and ethical advertisements.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top