Flat vs Curved Spacetime: Are They Truly Equivalent?

  • Thread starter Naty1
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Spacetime
In summary, Kip Thorne starts out Chapter 11 of BLACK HOLES AND TIME WARPS with that question. He wonders if spacetime is actually flat or if the clocks and rulers we use to measure it are actually rubbery. Both viewpoints give the same predictions for any measurements performed. Some problems are solved most easily and quickly using the curved spacetime paradigm; others, using the flat spacetime paradigm. Black hole problems, for example, are most amenable to curved spacetime techniques; gravitational wave problems (for, example computing the waves produced when two neutron stars orbit each other) are most amenable to flat spacetime techniques. The laws that underlie the two paradigms are mathematically equivalent. That is why physic
  • #1
Naty1
5,606
40
Kip Thorne starts out Chapter 11 of BLACK HOLES AND TIME WARPS with that question.
I wondered what experts here might think of that within the context of the following:

Isn't it conceiveable that spacetime is actually flat but the clocks and rulers we use to measure it are actually rubbery?...yes...Both viewpoints give precisely the same predictions for any measurements performed...Some problems are are solved most easily and quickly using the curved spacetime paradigm; others, using the flat spacetime...Black hole problems, for example, are most amenable to curved spacetime techniques; gravitational wave problems (for, example computing the waves produced when two neutron stars orbit each other) are most amenable to flat spacetime techniques...the laws that underlie the two paradigms are mathematically equivalent...That is why physicsts were not content with Einstein's curved spacetime paradigm and have developed the flat spacetime paradigm as a supplement to it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How then could we explain gravitational lensing in a flat spacetime? I don't think my eyes would be rubbery. :D
 
  • #3
Blenton said:
How then could we explain gravitational lensing in a flat spacetime? I don't think my eyes would be rubbery. :D

The flat spacetime paradigm doesn't give you different predictions, than the curved spacetime paradigm. It is just a philosophical question: Is spacetime curved or is just every observable thing behaving as it was curved.
 
  • #4
This good idea fails inside the BH horizon, where you have actually a separate (from the entire universe) flow of time. So it can't be explained by just time/space dilation.
 
  • #5
Dimitry..according to Thorne they ARE mathematically equivalent...everywhere in everyway...that's why I posted it...In your example, gravitational lensing, the conventional "curved space" paradigm does seem a better approach...

AT has stated it precisely the way Thorne presents it...
 
  • #6
Hm... Strange.
Whats about closed universe then? Can the flat space mimic all topological (non local) properties of a curved spacetime?
 
  • #7
Re: Is spacetime really curved?

Yes, it is not only curved, but also filled with singularities. Think of a growing cactus as a model.

Bob.
 
  • #8
This kind of fits into what I've been thinking... Is light really curved by space? Or is it still going in a straight line? I assume it's both...
 
  • #9
Science doesn't answer questions like "is space really curved?". Theories don't tell us what something is like. They only tell us what the results of experiments will be (or more generally, what the probabilities of the possible results are, given the results of previous experiments). We can usually interpret a theory as describing what something really is like, but the only thing experiments can tell us is how accurate the predictions are.

It seems that in this case, we have an alternative theory's equivalent to GR, at least in the sense that it makes the same predictions about the results of experiments, but probably also in the sense that the axioms of either theory can be derived from the axioms of the other.

The alternative theory describes spacetime and measuring devices in a different way. We know that both of these descriptions are incorrect, since the theories don't include quantum phenomena, but let's forget about that for a moment and pretend that the universe is classical. Which description is correct? What could possibly answer that, if experiments can't? (Hint:)
 
  • #10
NWH said:
This kind of fits into what I've been thinking... Is light really curved by space? Or is it still going in a straight line? I assume it's both...
It's going in a straight line in GR. I don't really know the alternative theory, but it sounds like the path is curved in that one.
 
  • #11
Fredrik said:
It seems that in this case, we have an alternative theory's equivalent to GR, at least in the sense that it makes the same predictions about the results of experiments, but probably also in the sense that the axioms of either theory can be derived from the axioms of the other.

Well, that's the question. Thorne indicates the theories are fully equivalent, and so does MTW. But is that right even down to admitting the same space of solutions?
 

1. What is spacetime and how is it related to curvature?

Spacetime is a mathematical concept that combines the three dimensions of space and the dimension of time into a single entity. It is a fundamental aspect of Einstein's theory of general relativity, which explains how gravity works. According to this theory, mass and energy warp or curve the fabric of spacetime, causing objects to follow curved paths in space.

2. How do we know that spacetime is curved?

There is strong evidence for the curvature of spacetime, including observations of the bending of light by massive objects, such as stars and galaxies. The predictions of general relativity have also been confirmed through various experiments and observations, providing further evidence for the curvature of spacetime.

3. What does it mean for spacetime to be curved?

When we say that spacetime is curved, we mean that the geometry of spacetime is not flat and can be affected by the presence of mass and energy. This curvature is described by the mathematical equations of general relativity and can be visualized as a stretched or warped grid that determines how objects move in space.

4. Is spacetime curved everywhere?

According to general relativity, the curvature of spacetime is not constant and can vary depending on the distribution of mass and energy in a given region. In some regions, spacetime may be relatively flat, while in others it may be highly curved. The amount of curvature also depends on the strength of the gravitational field in that region.

5. Can spacetime be uncurved?

In the context of general relativity, it is not possible for spacetime to be completely uncurved. However, in certain regions where there is no matter or energy present, the curvature of spacetime may be negligible and can be approximated as flat. This is known as the flat spacetime limit and is often used in simpler calculations and models.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
495
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
730
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
84
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
1K
Back
Top