- #1
oneamp
- 219
- 0
The subject seems inexact to me. For example:
--
In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
---
The question is:
Statements: Video libraries are flourishing very much these days.
Conclusions:
People in general have got a video craze.
It is much cheaper to see as many movies as one likes on videos rather than going to the cinema hall.
----
I conclude neither of them, because there's not enough evidence to say that either I or II caused it. But the test says both of them. What do I miss?
Thanks
--
In each question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.
---
The question is:
Statements: Video libraries are flourishing very much these days.
Conclusions:
People in general have got a video craze.
It is much cheaper to see as many movies as one likes on videos rather than going to the cinema hall.
----
I conclude neither of them, because there's not enough evidence to say that either I or II caused it. But the test says both of them. What do I miss?
Thanks