- #1
wdlang
- 307
- 0
Perrin got his nobel prize because of his experiment on brownian motion, which is thought to have proven the existence of atoms
i cannot understand that
if you see an array of dots from STM, i believe you demonstrate the existence of atoms
but i cannot see why perrin's experiment or brownian motion has anything to do with atoms
it cannot be explained without atoms?
i cannot understand that
if you see an array of dots from STM, i believe you demonstrate the existence of atoms
but i cannot see why perrin's experiment or brownian motion has anything to do with atoms
it cannot be explained without atoms?