- #1
kmb
- 4
- 0
I had an interesting thought regarding the "arrow of time" and, with the hope of getting the opinion of someone possessing more relevant knowledge than do I, I'm posting it here.
Essentially, I thought that it may be productive to contemplate the notion of a unidirectional flow of time. I do not see a causal connection running from future to past. From this, I would think that it does not make logical sense to say that time can be run in reverse (reworded: it only runs in one direction). It would not, by its very nature, support symmetry, rendering the problem of the arrow of time null.
That many physical processes seem to be able to be run in reverse is a result of our descriptions of these processes, not a property of time itself.
I realize that I may be unaware of an error in my reasoning, and if such an error exists, please make no attempt to spare my feelings, and please do enlighten me as to its existence and nature.
-kmb
Essentially, I thought that it may be productive to contemplate the notion of a unidirectional flow of time. I do not see a causal connection running from future to past. From this, I would think that it does not make logical sense to say that time can be run in reverse (reworded: it only runs in one direction). It would not, by its very nature, support symmetry, rendering the problem of the arrow of time null.
That many physical processes seem to be able to be run in reverse is a result of our descriptions of these processes, not a property of time itself.
I realize that I may be unaware of an error in my reasoning, and if such an error exists, please make no attempt to spare my feelings, and please do enlighten me as to its existence and nature.
-kmb