Magnesium-Based Stents: Testing & Controlling Corrosion Rates

  • Thread starter jared530
  • Start date
In summary: Anodizing would definitely help with corrosion, but it's not a guarantee. Additionally, it's not clear if anodizing is really necessary for a magnesium-based alloy (many alloys are anodized).Your project may be best served by consulting with a professional engineer who can help you analyze your specific situation and recommend the most appropriate course of action.
  • #1
jared530
4
0
Hi everyone,

Noob to the forums, but forum junkie in different hobbies. Anyways, my senior project is to identify appropriate bench test to characterize degradation behaviors of magnesium-based alloys (stents). Form of final device and complexities of an in vivo environment can impact results, so made assumptions whenever possible.

Also to identify and test options to slow/or control corrosion rates of mg-based alloys.

Currently were modeling different stent designs in COMSOL, and modeling the degradation rate(erosion corrosion) as a function of ion concentration, pH and flow velocity.

Our team is having some trouble formulating equations to plug into COMSOL.

The question is, does anyone have any suggestions on how I can arrive at a time dependent relationship for erosion corrosion of a metal as a functions of ion concentration, pH and flow velocity?

Please feel free to ask any questions.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sorry it's not exactly your question, but...

I don't expect a software to make any decent prediction of corrosion rate.
The best human experts don't make accurate predictions. They experiment.

Corrosion rate does not relate to a limited set of parameters like pH, ion concentration and flow velocity!
If your software proposes this to deduce a corrosion rate, be sure the prediction will be meaningless.

Corrosion rate does heavily depend on the alloy composition, on its thermal history... For stainless steel, if welds are to resist corrosion, you take a variant with <0.02% C instead of <0.06% C - just as an example. But a bit of chlorine ions in water would let you choose an other alloy, with Mo.

More: in a medical implant, the release of toxic ions is more important than the corrosion rate. Do you enjoy zirconium in your patient's body? Chromium? Usual in magnesium.

I'm also surprised that people consider magnesium for an implant. Though the Mg ingots I had did not corrode quickly, you should consider that implants use very special alloys, because stainless isn't good enough for them. They have specially-designed cobalt and titanium alloys, produced only for implants.

For such a demanding use (vital, in fact) I'd never rely on a software.
 
  • #3
Enthalpy said:
Sorry it's not exactly your question, but...

I don't expect a software to make any decent prediction of corrosion rate.
The best human experts don't make accurate predictions. They experiment.

Corrosion rate does not relate to a limited set of parameters like pH, ion concentration and flow velocity!
If your software proposes this to deduce a corrosion rate, be sure the prediction will be meaningless.

Corrosion rate does heavily depend on the alloy composition, on its thermal history... For stainless steel, if welds are to resist corrosion, you take a variant with <0.02% C instead of <0.06% C - just as an example. But a bit of chlorine ions in water would let you choose an other alloy, with Mo.

More: in a medical implant, the release of toxic ions is more important than the corrosion rate. Do you enjoy zirconium in your patient's body? Chromium? Usual in magnesium.

I'm also surprised that people consider magnesium for an implant. Though the Mg ingots I had did not corrode quickly, you should consider that implants use very special alloys, because stainless isn't good enough for them. They have specially-designed cobalt and titanium alloys, produced only for implants.

For such a demanding use (vital, in fact) I'd never rely on a software.

Thank you so much for your reply. Your actually very right, variables that effect corrosion are essentially unlimited and it would be impossible to model the rate in any software. I guess we can use the model only as a stress-point indicator to formulate an appropriate geometry for the stent.

I realize the metal ions absorbed into the blood stream should be biocompatible. The composition were supposed to be testing wasn’t specified by the company who’s hosting this project, so I’m guessing we can alloy with what we feel appropriate. But magnesium should be the main component because the scope of the project is to control the degradation rate of Mg-based stents to 6-8 months, and after this period, should start degrading and absorbing into the blood stream. This is mainly to avoid a second surgery, which would happen if you used SS or NiTi.

Do you have any ideas on how we can control this degradation rate? Currently bare-metal magnesium degrades in a period of 1 month, and we would like to extend this to 6-8 months. Currently we have come up with the options: heat treatments of the Mg-alloy; and coating the metal with a biodegradable polymer.
 
  • #4
Again an offroad question, sorry for that, but...

Do you have an absolutely safe means to guarantee that only ions from your stent will move in the blood? Metal chips are not desired in a patient!

Slower degradation: maybe with purer magnesium, but it should get even softer then.
Could you try to anodize your alloy? (I'm not very sure it helps with magnesium...)
 
  • #5
Enthalpy said:
Again an offroad question, sorry for that, but...

Do you have an absolutely safe means to guarantee that only ions from your stent will move in the blood? Metal chips are not desired in a patient!

Slower degradation: maybe with purer magnesium, but it should get even softer then.
Could you try to anodize your alloy? (I'm not very sure it helps with magnesium...)

The patient will experience "chunking" of metal especially w/ bare Mg because of the super fast rate.

Would anodizing result in a extremely slow degradation rate(over 10 months)? Or would the oxide even break down in the body?
 

FAQ: Magnesium-Based Stents: Testing & Controlling Corrosion Rates

1. What are magnesium-based stents?

Magnesium-based stents are medical devices used to treat blocked or narrow arteries. They are made of a biodegradable material called magnesium, which gradually dissolves in the body over time.

2. How do magnesium-based stents work?

Magnesium-based stents are inserted into the blocked or narrow artery during a minimally invasive procedure. As the stent dissolves, it releases medication to prevent the artery from becoming blocked again and allows the artery to heal and regain its natural function.

3. What are the potential benefits of using magnesium-based stents?

One of the main benefits of magnesium-based stents is that they are biodegradable, meaning they do not need to be removed from the body after they have done their job. This reduces the risk of long-term complications and the need for additional procedures. Additionally, magnesium is a naturally occurring mineral in the body and is less likely to cause an allergic reaction or inflammation compared to other stent materials.

4. How are corrosion rates of magnesium-based stents tested and controlled?

Corrosion rates of magnesium-based stents are tested in laboratory settings using techniques such as electrochemical testing and immersion testing. These methods measure the rate of degradation of the stent material in simulated body fluids. To control corrosion rates, the composition and surface treatment of the stent can be adjusted to optimize its performance.

5. What are the potential challenges or limitations of using magnesium-based stents?

One of the main challenges of using magnesium-based stents is controlling the rate of degradation. If the stent dissolves too quickly, it may not provide enough support for the artery to heal properly. On the other hand, if it dissolves too slowly, it may cause long-term complications. Additionally, magnesium-based stents are currently only approved for use in certain types of blockages, so they may not be suitable for all patients.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
48
Views
8K
Back
Top