Where does binding energy, or internal kinetic energy exist?

In summary, the gravitational binding energy of a system works differently than the electromagnetic binding energy. It cannot be localized in the same way and is not a unique or covariant quantity. In an asymptotically flat space-time, it can be approximated as the ADM or Bondi energy of the system. However, there is no consistent way to localize it in terms of energy density.
  • #1
mrspeedybob
869
65
If I have 2 electricly charged bodies orbiting one another, the binding energy must contribute to the gravitation of the system. Their reletive KE must also. So the total gravitational mass of the system is greater then the sum of the indivual objects. If I used a laser and gravitational lensing to map mass distribution of the system where would I find the extra mass?

Next question: Does gravitational binding energy work the same way? How large is the gravitational binding energy and the internal kinetic inergy of a galaxy in comparison to the missing mass-energy of dark matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There does not have to be any extra mass. The energy and momentum will also gravitate. So will the electric field, in its own right. The energy-momentum tensor of static charged matter includes terms for the mass and the electric field.
 
  • #3
That's right but the sign of binding energy depends on the interaction. For example, binding energy of helium nucleus is negative (you gain energy by fusing hydrogen into helium) while binding energy of uranium is positive (you gain energy by fission instead). With gravity, binding energy is always negative, so a bound system has less energy than an unbound system. This is because gravity always sucks.

As a side note, if the binding energy would be so massive that it could explain dark matter, gravity would be entirely unstable, because the binding energy would feed to itself, basically making all massive objects have infinite energy.
 
  • #4
mrspeedybob said:
If I have 2 electricly charged bodies orbiting one another, the binding energy must contribute to the gravitation of the system. Their reletive KE must also. So the total gravitational mass of the system is greater then the sum of the indivual objects. If I used a laser and gravitational lensing to map mass distribution of the system where would I find the extra mass?

There's a consistent definition of energy for the electrically bound system - you'll find that the total energy is the kinetic energy plus the energy stored in the electromagnetic fields - in geometric units said field energy is proportional to E^2 - B^2. In the case where B=0, I believe this expresssion become 1/2 epsilon E^2 in non-geometric units (from wiki).

If you have point charges you have the usual problem with the infinities of the electromagnetic field energy - I'm not quite sure how this is dealt with, except by avoiding point particles.

Next question: Does gravitational binding energy work the same way? How large is the gravitational binding energy and the internal kinetic inergy of a galaxy in comparison to the missing mass-energy of dark matter?

You can't, in general, localize the gravitational binding energy the same way you did the electromagnetic energy. If you are in an asymptotically flat space-time you'll be able to define a conserved energy which should be the ADM and/or Bondi energy of the system (and as far as I know the two energies should be equal if there are no gravitational waves). But there won't be a single, consistent way to localize this in terms of an energy density.

Being in an asymptotically flat space-time is more-or-less necessary to carry out your experiment anyway, or at least very highly convenient. Asymptotically flat space-time means that there isn't any effect from the rest of the universe. If you restrict yourself to a small enough area, you can probably use the asymptotically flat calculations as a reasonable approximation to what you actually measure.

A coarse scan will show, from the outside, a gravitational field that looks like that of a single rotating mass with the appropriate energy - I believe the system will have a metric that looks pretty much like a Kerr metric.

A finer scan will reveal the details with two orbiting particles.

You'll be able to predict light deflections - but there won't be a unique intepretation of them as an energy density that transforms in a covariant manner, alas. For instance, pseudotensor methods will give results that are both non-covariant and non-unique.
 

FAQ: Where does binding energy, or internal kinetic energy exist?

1. Where does binding energy come from?

Binding energy is a type of potential energy that exists within the nucleus of an atom. It comes from the strong nuclear force, which is the force that holds protons and neutrons together in the nucleus. This force is stronger than the electromagnetic force, which causes repulsion between positively charged protons. The binding energy is a result of the balance between these two forces.

2. What is the relationship between binding energy and mass?

Einstein's famous equation, E=mc², explains the relationship between mass and energy. Binding energy is a form of energy, and according to this equation, it has an equivalent mass. This means that when a nucleus is formed, the mass of the individual particles (protons and neutrons) decreases, and the binding energy increases. The total mass of the nucleus is less than the sum of the masses of its individual particles, and this difference is known as the mass defect.

3. How is binding energy released?

Binding energy is released when a nucleus undergoes a nuclear reaction, such as fusion or fission. In these reactions, the nuclei either combine or split apart, and the resulting nuclei have a higher binding energy than the initial nuclei. The excess energy is released in the form of radiation, such as heat or light.

4. Can binding energy be converted into other forms of energy?

Yes, binding energy can be converted into other forms of energy, such as thermal energy or kinetic energy. This conversion can occur through nuclear reactions, as mentioned before, or through radioactive decay. In radioactive decay, unstable nuclei release binding energy as they transform into more stable nuclei.

5. How does binding energy affect the stability of an atom?

The amount of binding energy in a nucleus determines its stability. Nuclei with a higher binding energy are more stable because they require more energy to break apart. This is why elements with larger nuclei, such as uranium, are more unstable and undergo radioactive decay more easily. The stability of an atom also depends on the balance between the strong nuclear force and the electromagnetic force, which is affected by the number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top