Visualisation in Quantum mechanics

In summary, a particle in the ground state of a potential well can only gain energy by transitioning to a higher energy level. The energy level diagram represents the energy eigenstates and the electron can be in a superposition of these states. If the electron jumps to another energy level, it could absorb or emit a photon. In an infinite potential well, the electron can jump to a different state within the same "shell". The concept of "shell" is used in atomic physics to represent a set of electron states with the same principal quantum number, but in a one-dimensional problem, this concept is not applicable.
  • #1
CAF123
Gold Member
2,948
88
A particle in the ground state of a potential well can only gain energy by making a transition to one of the higher allowed energy levels.
Let's consider this well to be a 1 dimensional infinite potential well with the electron bouncing between the walls of the well with certain discrete energies.
Two questions:

Is the energy level diagram just a pictorial representation of the varying quantised energies that the electron can possibly have?

If we were to view this electron, if it jumped to another energy level, how would this manifest itself into something we could observe, ie if it moved to some higher level, would we simply observe the electron moving faster between the walls of the well?

Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is the energy level diagram just a pictorial representation of the varying quantised energies that the electron can possibly have?
It is a representation of the energy eigenstates. The electron can be in a superposition of them, with arbitrary expectation values for the energy (but at least the ground state energy).

If we were to view this electron, if it jumped to another energy level, how would this manifest itself into something we could observe
It could absorb or emit a photon, for example.

would we simply observe the electron moving faster between the walls of the well?
If you can observe an actual "movement" of the electron (for example by measuring the charge distribution somehow), you disturb it in a significant way and change its states every time you measure it.

The energy eigenstates do not represent an electron bouncing back and forth.
 
  • #3
When you say it could absorb or emit a photon, does this also apply to the infinite potential well? (I know it can be applied to an atomic potential such as the energy levels in an atom)
So if an infinite potential well, if the electron absorbed a photon, it would have greater energy?

Also, for an electron in an atom, when it receives a photon, it jumps to a higher energy level. This corresponds to the electron moving to another shell in the atomic structure?
What happens in an infinite potential well? The energy level diagram is still present, but this time there is no shells or anything to properly 'visualise' what is going on?

Many thanks.
 
  • #4
So if an infinite potential well, if the electron absorbed a photon, it would have greater energy?
This is true for all potential well shapes, yes.

Also, for an electron in an atom, when it receives a photon, it jumps to a higher energy level. This corresponds to the electron moving to another shell in the atomic structure?
It can go to a different state in the same "shell", too.

What happens in an infinite potential well? The energy level diagram is still present, but this time there is no shells or anything to properly 'visualise' what is going on?
Well, you could call every energy state a "shell".
 
  • #5
Thanks, but what is this 'shell' in the infinite potential well?
 
  • #6
In atomic physics "shell" is nothing else but a name for "a set of electron states in an atom" with the same principal quantum number n. The n'th shell contains N=2n² states, where N can be calculated from the allowed values for the quantum numbers l=0,1,...,n-1; m=-l,-l+1,...,l-1,l and s = +1/2, -1/2.

In a one-dim. problem the quantum numbers l and m do not exist b/c they label the representations of the 3-dim. rotation group SO(3). So in one dim. a "shell" would be a set of states for same n and different s, so the n'th "shell" would always contain two states s = +1/2, -1/2. Neglecting spin the n'th shell is identical with the n'th state; I don't think that it makes much sense to use "shell" here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_configuration#Shells_and_subshells
 

Related to Visualisation in Quantum mechanics

1. What is visualisation in quantum mechanics?

Visualisation in quantum mechanics refers to the use of mathematical models and diagrams to represent the behavior of particles at the quantum level. This can help scientists better understand and predict the behavior of particles and their interactions.

2. Why is visualisation important in quantum mechanics?

Visualisation is important in quantum mechanics because it allows scientists to better comprehend and communicate complex concepts and theories. It also helps in the development of new theories and predictions about the behavior of particles at the quantum level.

3. Can we directly observe quantum phenomena?

No, we cannot directly observe quantum phenomena as they occur at a very small scale and cannot be seen with the naked eye. However, visualisation techniques can help us understand and make predictions about these phenomena.

4. How do visualisation techniques differ from traditional methods of understanding physics?

Visualisation techniques in quantum mechanics differ from traditional methods of understanding physics in that they rely heavily on mathematical models and diagrams rather than physical experiments. They also take into account the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics, which is not typically seen in classical physics.

5. Are there limitations to visualisation in quantum mechanics?

Yes, there are limitations to visualisation in quantum mechanics. Since quantum systems behave differently from classical systems, it is not always possible to accurately represent their behavior using visualisation techniques. Additionally, visualisation can only provide an approximation of the behavior of particles, and may not always reflect the true nature of quantum phenomena.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
854
Replies
8
Views
934
Replies
1
Views
432
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top