Rice refuses to predict US out of Iraq within ten years

  • News
  • Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Years
In summary, during a hearing on Iraq, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was repeatedly questioned about the possibility of a troop withdrawal. She stated that any decision would need to be results-based and not time-based, but refused to rule out the possibility of troops still being in Iraq five or 10 years from now. Some senators expressed doubts about the feasibility of achieving a unitary, democratic Iraq, and concerns were raised about the impact on women's rights. The media also focused on Rice's physical appearance during the hearing, with some calling her "demonic." There were also accusations of media bias and political agendas.
  • #36
Well the thread on permanent US bases could be added to this one.

But in general, I'll make a prediction that Bush's "War on Terrorism" will be as successful as the US "War on Drugs". After 3 or more decades of trying to stem drug trafficking into the US, one can still find the same drugs on the streets of many US cities, towns and suburbs, as one could find 30 or 40 years ago.

In other words, Bush's policy on terrorism is and will be another colossal failure!

In fact, IMO, Bush is a colossal failure! :rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Well, Rice already knew that the US occupation would be indefinite (and definitely longer than 10 yrs), when she was director of the NSA. She may(IMO) have helped draft the plan for the occupation. In a previos post on another thread, it was pointed out that immediately upon deployment US forces rushed to secure the Iraqi oil ministry headquarters and oil assets(fields, equipment, ect.). Reading the posts about permanent bases - the endless streams of concrete and military quarters and airstrips and a Wendy's, Taco Bell ... well maybe not those two but it did say some fast food type place - the people of Iraq did not come close to getting what was promised it even looks as though their liberation was a sham or con job to blow this through American ears (Congress), a smoke and mirrors trick so that the real objective could be launched with little or no opposition.
 
  • #38
Rice was interviewed last night on Meet The Press. Did anyone else view this? I don't know if the transcripts are available yet, but after wading through all the BS, this is it in a nutshell:

Saddam represents the old (bad) Middle East, and needed to be removed regardless of WMD or "clear and present" danger. Thanks to our wonderful Commander-in Chief, Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine are now democracies, and there will now be a new (good) Middle East. Oh sure, there are still a few hitches--well these are to be expected in new democracies, just as the U.S. and all democracies must evolve.

Don't worry about the complete differences in cultures and that these governments are likely to become Islamic theocracies and/or continue to support terrorism. Don't worry about a civil war in Iraq. The Iraqi troops continue to progress toward independence. When Tim mentioned how much is being spent on these wars, Rice did wince ever so briefly, but the topic was changed and never addressed.
 
  • #39
I missed it this week but will catch it later. I so enjoy being lied to and deceived.

What gets me is that for the price of the Iraq war - by the time we get out of there, if we ever do - we could virtually end our dependence on oil.
 
  • #40
I missed it this week but will catch it later. I so enjoy being lied to and deceived.

What gets me is that for the price of the Iraq war - by the time we get out of there, if we ever do - we could virtually end our dependence on oil.
But it takes oil money to make oil money... natch.
 
  • #41
One of the consequences of this dysfunction, as I have noted many times, is the unending parade of dead or badly wounded men and women returning to the U.S. from the war in Iraq - a war that the administration foolishly launched but now does not know how to win or end.
This observation/statement along with the statement by Chomsky (below) about how the WMD materials the UN inspectors were destroying that wound up unguarded after the invasion are major reasons the US needs to oust Bush and his cronies.
Once again we find, very easily, a way to reduce the threat of terror: stop acting in ways that – predictably – enhance the threat. Though enhancement of the threat of terror and proliferation was anticipated, the invasion did so even in unanticipated ways. It is common to say that no WMD were found in Iraq after exhaustive search. That is not quite accurate, however. There were stores of WMD in Iraq: namely, those produced in the 1980s, thanks to aid provided by the US and Britain, along with others. These sites had been secured by UN inspectors, who were dismantling the weapons. But the inspectors were dismissed by the invaders and the sites were left unguarded. The inspectors nevertheless continued to carry out their work with satellite imagery. They discovered sophisticated massive looting of these installations in over 100 sites, including equipment for producing solid and liquid propellant missiles, biotoxins and other materials usable for chemical and biological weapons, and high-precision equipment capable of making parts for nuclear and chemical weapons and missiles. A Jordanian journalist was informed by officials in charge of the Jordanian-Iraqi border that after US-UK forces took over, radioactive materials were detected in one of every eight trucks crossing to Jordan, destination unknown.
The ironies are almost inexpressible. The official justification for the US-UK invasion was to prevent the use of WMD that did not exist. The invasion provided the terrorists who had been mobilized by the US and its allies with the means to develop WMD -- namely, equipment they had provided to Saddam, caring nothing about the terrible crimes they later invoked to whip up support for the invasion. It is as if Iran were now making nuclear weapons using fissionable materials provided by the US to Iran under the Shah -- which may indeed be happening.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
978
  • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top