Death camps in Poland - Obama's slip

  • News
  • Thread starter Borek
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Death Slip
In summary, President Obama made a mistake during his speech yesterday when he referred to the death camps located in Poland as Polish death camps. Many Poles are upset about this and think that the phrase is more reminiscent of the Nazi camps located in Poland than it is of camps that were Polish-sanctioned.
  • #1
Borek
Mentor
28,950
4,245
Sigh. Who writes Obama's speeches? For many years we fought US press and media so that they will stop mentioning "Polish death camps" instead of "death camps located in Poland". Small difference in wording, but huge difference in meaning. To some extent we were successful, many important papers added ban on "Polish death camps" to their editorial rules.

Yesterday, Obama bestowed a Medal [STRIKE]of Honor[/STRIKE] of Freedom on a Polish WWII hero, Jan Kozielewski (known as Karski), and during his speech said "Polish death camps". What an irony. Karski is turning in the grave, he was one of the first people (if not the first person) that run from occupied Poland to the West to alarm the Allies about atrocities and genocide going on in the Nazi's concentration camps.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ah - so that's what the current fuss is about. :rolleyes:
 
  • #3
About as many Poles died in the camps located in Poland as did Jews. When the Russians freed the camps, they found stores of Zyklon B gas far surpassing the amount needed to kill all the Jews in Europe. It is clear that the intention of the Nazis was to keep on killing and killing forever.

H Himmler said:
All Polish specialists will be exploited in our military-industrial complex. Later, all Poles will disappear from this world. It is imperative that the great German nation considers the elimination of all Polish people as its chief task.

Heinrich Himmler was commander of the Schutzstaffel (SS), the group that operated the camps.
 
  • #4
Think positve. Its seems likely that all the remaining presidential candidates (a) have heard of Poland (b) have a vague idea where it is, and (c) don't think they can see it from their house. The situation could be much worse than that.
 
  • #5
Borek said:
Sigh. Who writes Obama's speeches? For many years we fought US press and media so that they will stop mentioning "Polish death camps" instead of "death camps located in Poland". Small difference in wording, but huge difference in meaning. To some extent we were successful, many important papers added ban on "Polish death camps" to their editorial rules.

Yesterday, Obama bestowed a Medal of Honor on a Polish WWII hero, Jan Kozielewski (known as Karski), and during his speech said "Polish death camps". What an irony. Karski is turning in the grave, he was one of the first people (if not the first person) that run from occupied Poland to the West to alarm the Allies about atrocities and genocide going on in the Nazi's concentration camps.

I honestly fail to see why all the fuss. I'm sure Obama just meant that the death camps were located geographically in Poland, and was not trying (consciously or otherwise) to shift blame from the Nazis to the Poles.

To take another example, a particularly egregious instance of the British invaders' ignominious massacre of a large civilian population in India has always been referred to as the "Jallianwala Bagh massacre" or the "Amritsar massacre", referring to the location where the atrocity took place. I don't think the name has ever been controversial, but perhaps it should be called the "British massacre" to be PC? :rolleyes:
 
  • #6
Curious3141 said:
I honestly fail to see why all the fuss.
Yes, I'm sure it was an honest mistake, but I can also see why Poles are sensitive about it, so I think they are entitled to be a little upset about it.

Amercians? Notsomuch.
 
  • #7
Curious3141 said:
I honestly fail to see why all the fuss. I'm sure Obama just meant that the death camps were located geographically in Poland, and was not trying (consciously or otherwise) to shift blame from the Nazis to the Poles.

I don't get it either. I bet if it wasn't election season you would never even have heard about this. I just figured it was the GOP trying to smear Obama again.
 
  • #8
Topher925 said:
I don't get it either. I bet if it wasn't election season you would never even have heard about this. I just figured it was the GOP trying to smear Obama again.

Every President has their gaffes. President Obama thinks there's 57 US States and that there are Polish death camps, President GW Bush couldn't pronounce a few words right, President Ford tripped every where he went, President Clinton turned the White House into his own Playboy Mansion, President Kennedy said he was a jelly doughnut, etc...

Personally, whenever I have heard the phrase 'Polish death camps' I think 'Nazi camps located in Poland' not Polish-sanctioned camps. I do understand the connotation, however, and think that it's an unfortunate phrasing which is a bit easier to say (Americans love their language shortcuts!).
 
  • #9
Topher925 said:
I don't get it either. I bet if it wasn't election season you would never even have heard about this. I just figured it was the GOP trying to smear Obama again.

Actually, it seems its mostly Polish people that are upset about it. Not *everything* is about American politics. :wink:
 
  • #10
mege said:
Personally, whenever I have heard the phrase 'Polish death camps' I think 'Nazi camps located in Poland' not Polish-sanctioned camps.

Trick is, many people may be not aware of the difference. Especially taking into account level of knowledge of history and geography in the general public (not necessarily American general public, although it is proverbial).
 
  • #11
I think it's important to be respectful of the cultural norms in other countries, especially when it comes to talking about one of the most significant things to ever happen in that country.
 
  • #12
Let me put it differently - would you like to hear people referring to 9/11 as an American terrorist attack?

(This is unrelated to SHISHKABOB post above, it just occurred to me that it can be a good example of a sloppy language use).

Note: I am perfectly aware of the fact it can be seen from the outside as a bloated sensitivity or something like that, which is why I don't care much about such things when they happen in press or on TV. But this is a high profile case, not some undereducated journalist.
 
  • #13
That's not quite the same, Borek. An attack is an event, a "camp" is an object. IMO, the problem here is mostly of ambiguity in the functioning of the English language. Consider:

Boston Marathon
Normandy invasion (of German forces on Franch land, by allied forces)
Russian Campaign (invasion of Russia by Napoleon)
German autobahn
Berlin/German Olympics
German Chocolate Cake

Boston is a city, "German" is a group of people from Germany doing something (an event done by the people), an object in the country of Germany, an event in the country of Germany and a food invented in Germany, by Germans. But it just so happens that while "German" can mean from Germany or people of Germany, "Boston" refers only to the city. The inhabitants are "Bostonians". Perhaps because the word is cumbersome, it isn't often used. But "German" or "Polish" can equally describe an event in the country or by the people of that country. But that creates ambiguity if the "in" and "by" are two different countries.

Now there also aren't many conextexts in which an object or event happens in one country but is perpetrated by another and most of those have to do with war. In that sense, "Russian Campaign" and "Polish death camps" are similar. Russia wasn't invaded by Russians and the Polish didn't run the death camps. So the ambiguity happens because "Polish death camp" really can be referring to an object in Poland or an object owned by Poland. It's not really wrong, it is just ambiguous. But being that it is an object in a war, I'd tend to prefer specificity.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
I asked my Polish wife's ( 2nd gen Canadian ) mother the question at some point in the past. She had life just out of the camps and got shipped off to never never land ... and ended up here in Canada. Found a Man she knew ( blush and loved from back then ) married and I got to talk to her. ... hmmm hmmm I digress.

She seemed to think it was nothing. but she seemed quite intense about it.
to paraphrase ... ' ...No fool would think they were 'Polish' camps!...
There were many camps and we all know 'who's' they were. '

I agree with her, in that the designation, 'Polish death camp' or anywhereDeathcamp' are simply locators of the 'german' camps. No shame on the host country.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
Does anyone think this was the best choice of words? Perhaps, as the US press is suggesting, the Poles are oversensitive, but even if that were true, would it not have been wise to have framed this in a way less likely for them to take offense?

The most likely explanation is that this was written by some 22 year old Poly Sci major fresh out of college delighted to have a job as the junior assistant to the deputy assistant aide to the assistant deputy White House press secretary. And, unfortunately, for whatever reason, this wasn't deemed important enough for someone higher up to check.

By the way, it's the Presidential Medal of Freedom, not the Medal of Honor. Totally different awards.
 
  • #16
I think someone with good command of English should be able to distinguish between "Polish death camps" and "(German) death camps located in Poland".
 
  • #17
Borek, if it's any consolation, I can promise that when the typical American hears "Auschwitz" they immediately associate it with Nazis, *not* Poles.

In fact, I hate to admit it, but I bet very few even know it's located in Poland :frown:.
 
  • #18
Not that this gaffe will influence who I vote for in the election, in either direction, but we surely know that if it were Bush or Clinton who said that, they would get lambasted by the media.

Obama should be thankful that he is Obama.
 
  • #19
jduster said:
Not that this gaffe will influence who I vote for in the election, in either direction, but we surely know that if it were Bush or Clinton who said that, they would get lambasted by the media.

Obama should be thankful that he is Obama.

How can you say "we surely know"? Where are your references?
 

1. What are "death camps" in Poland?

"Death camps" in Poland refer to the concentration and extermination camps that were established by Nazi Germany during World War II. These camps were located in occupied Poland and were used to imprison and murder millions of Jews, Romani people, and other minority groups.

2. Was President Obama involved with these camps?

No, President Obama was not involved with the death camps in Poland. The camps were established by Nazi Germany during World War II, while Obama was born in 1961.

3. Why did Obama refer to the camps as "Polish"?

Obama's statement was likely a slip of the tongue, as he was trying to emphasize the fact that the camps were located in Poland, not that they were Polish-run or sanctioned. This distinction is important to make, as it recognizes that the camps were a result of Nazi occupation and not a reflection of the actions of the Polish people.

4. How did Poland respond to Obama's statement?

The Polish government and people were understandably upset by Obama's slip of the tongue and requested a formal apology. Obama later clarified his statement and expressed his regret for any misunderstandings or offense caused by his choice of words.

5. Why is it important to use accurate language when discussing the death camps in Poland?

Using accurate and respectful language is important because it honors the victims and survivors of the death camps and acknowledges the atrocities that occurred. It also helps to prevent the spread of misinformation and perpetuation of harmful stereotypes. Additionally, it is important to not attribute the responsibility for the camps to the Polish people, who were also victims of Nazi occupation.

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top