- #1
Gacha
- 8
- 0
Good Day!
First of all, I'm not an actual physicist so please don't laugh if the following sounds really stupid to you or I don't use the correct terminology. I don't/didn't even study anything remotely related to physics, everything is plainly based on private interest. (The reason I'm still posting in this sub forum follows)
During my free period from university I came across the 10-Dimension theory because I found it really interesting. Everything about it sounds logically clear to me when I learned/read/heard about it, so is the String Theory.
However! When I made up my own thoughts about how dimensions could be built I already stumbled on the fourth dimension. Who said it had to be duration/time? If it wasn't, wouldn't it completely change the way we look at String Theory and most things similar to it? Is there a logical explanation that I just don't see or it it plainly yet another assumption that is interchangeable?
Thank you in advance for your time and patience reading through it!
First of all, I'm not an actual physicist so please don't laugh if the following sounds really stupid to you or I don't use the correct terminology. I don't/didn't even study anything remotely related to physics, everything is plainly based on private interest. (The reason I'm still posting in this sub forum follows)
During my free period from university I came across the 10-Dimension theory because I found it really interesting. Everything about it sounds logically clear to me when I learned/read/heard about it, so is the String Theory.
However! When I made up my own thoughts about how dimensions could be built I already stumbled on the fourth dimension. Who said it had to be duration/time? If it wasn't, wouldn't it completely change the way we look at String Theory and most things similar to it? Is there a logical explanation that I just don't see or it it plainly yet another assumption that is interchangeable?
Thank you in advance for your time and patience reading through it!
Last edited: